On 2015-01-13 05:28, Minh Nguyen wrote:
On 2015-01-12 11:23, Elliott Plack wrote:
Great start on this Minh,
I tried to tackle this in the Baltimore Washington region last year.
After reading the wiki, I decided on the following classifications:
* hamlet: census population was less than 200
*
On 2015-01-12 11:23, Elliott Plack wrote:
Great start on this Minh,
I tried to tackle this in the Baltimore Washington region last year.
After reading the wiki, I decided on the following classifications:
* hamlet: census population was less than 200
* village: census pop. between 200 and
Great start on this Minh,
I tried to tackle this in the Baltimore Washington region last year. After
reading the wiki, I decided on the following classifications:
* hamlet: census population was less than 200
* village: census pop. between 200 and 1
* town: census pop. between 10001 and
2015-01-09 12:45 GMT+01:00 Minh Nguyen m...@nguyen.cincinnati.oh.us:
but more importantly, it accurately reflects what going to town means in
the surrounding area. That seems to be the idea behind the wiki's nebulous
definitions.
+1
cheers,
Martin
Recently I've been trying to improve the distribution of place=village
versus place=town in my area. Originally municipalities were tagged
based on their populations, resulting in clusters of place=cities in
urban and suburban areas and a desert of place=hamlets everywhere else.
And there's a
5 matches
Mail list logo
