As the Remap-a-Tron is expanding its scope beyond remapping, I'll submit "Map
Roulette" as a new name. In case you're looking for a new name, that is :)
On Oct 1, 2012, at 1:52 AM, Martijn van Exel wrote:
> Also a good one. I will make a list of all the suggestions some time
> this week. There
On 10/2/2012 11:15 AM, the Old Topo Depot wrote:
Regarding TIGER county connectivity; since the last OSMI update GA, AL
and northern MS have had county boundary issues cleaned.
What's left is KY, LA, AR, southeastern TX, and portions of VA, TN, and
KS. States such as ME and southeastern MA also
Regarding TIGER county connectivity; since the last OSMI update GA, AL and
northern MS have had county boundary issues cleaned.
What's left is KY, LA, AR, southeastern TX, and portions of VA, TN, and KS.
States such as ME and southeastern MA also have scattered boundaries that
have not been addre
Well as a start is I put a section into the QA tools page
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Quality_assurance#Remap-a-Tron
Several projects there that ideas/code/SQL might be borrowed from.
Well your obviously familiar with this :) did the issues found by this
query all get resolved?
http://oegeo
The setup involves designing the SQL queries and the initial database,
and tweaking the front end for different types of problems. Up until
now, we have been able to get away with just displaying the
non-remapped way as a vector element on the leaflet map, but for
example forfolding ways that may n
I was just traveling and was reminded of a Tiger problem that still hasn't
been solved throughout the US-- the county line connectivity issue. It seems
like a good problem for remapatron-- it is relatively discrete, but it also
gives mappers the opportunity to do some additional improvement of
For setting up the runs, is it all SQL queries or are there other items
involved? Perhaps start a wiki page for useful queries to identify
problems (for this or other projects), or even just collaboration on plain
text criteria ideas for future runs and build what is needed from there.
Dale
On M
Also a good one. I will make a list of all the suggestions some time
this week. There's some low hanging fruit here, and some more complex
ideas. I don't know when I will have time to implement the next level,
I hope to have something up before Portland. Any help is appreciated!
Martijn
On Sun, S
Alan Millar wrote:
> Another suggestion: motorways and trunks without lanes=number tags
>
> - Alan
I'd help out with that.
Alexander
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
Another suggestion: motorways and trunks without lanes=number tags
- Alan
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
On 9/30/2012 12:10 AM, Brian May wrote:
And maybe have different remapatron modes, e.g. "crazy tiger" mode,
"streets with no name" mode, and "empty hoods" mode.
Yes - The "empty hoods" mode lends itself to importing the empty hood
directly from the TIGER data. We all complain about TIGER er
Hello,
John makes some excellent points. The key to making this
work would be to prioritize it. Otherwise, it's a neverending Remap-a-Tron.
I don't have any strong feelings about how that should be
done. I'm sure someone will come up with an excellent way to do that.
Charlotte
On 9/29/2012 5:33 PM, the Old Topo Depot wrote:
Statements that we should fix all the unedited TIGER data express a
Great Idea. They are, however, rather ambitious statements, and will
require more than a few weeks to completely realize. As such,
cleaning up US TIGER data is a Long Term goal,
oldtopos wrote
"I will also point out that the connectivity errors I mentioned earlier are,
in fact, largely a result of unedited TIGER data"
I'd be happy to go along with a flavour of a "connect-a-tron". It's very
hard not to clean up an entire neighbourhood/s when "crazy TIGER roads" are
spot
Statements that we should fix all the unedited TIGER data express a Great
Idea. They are, however, rather ambitious statements, and will require
more than a few weeks to completely realize. As such, cleaning up US TIGER
data is a Long Term goal, and does not say anything regarding how we might
pr
On Sep 29, 2012 10:05 AM, "Charlotte Wolter" wrote:
>
> ****I also think it would be great, if we could focus on unedited
> TIGER. That would clean up the map a lot. There may be some technical
> challenges, but overal it would be a good thing.
> ****I know someone suggested roads
I also think it would be great, if we could focus on
unedited TIGER. That would clean up the map a lot. There may be some
technical challenges, but overal it would be a good thing.
I know someone suggested roads without a name, though I
think there was discussion that would be
I think the most necessary cleanup to the USA OSM data is to clean up all
the crazy unedited original Tiger roads.
These can easily be identified simply as those ways that have a name but
are still the original Tiger data and have not been edited. (except for the
balrog-kun bot). You could just id
ass ways get
> higher priority.
>
> Simple query; simple fixes.
>
> Best,
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 8:49 AM, Paul Norman wrote:
>
>> > From: Martijn van Exel [mailto:m...@rtijn.org]
>> > Sent: Friday, September 28, 2012 8:29 AM
>> > Sub
On 9/28/2012 11:28 AM, Martijn van Exel wrote:
That would be a pretty complex query, for the following reasons:
* Similar naming may be obvious to a human observer, but can be really
hard to detect algorithmically.
* Similar geometry can be hard to detect because of split / combined
ways so you w
n Exel [mailto:m...@rtijn.org]
> > Sent: Friday, September 28, 2012 8:29 AM
> > Subject: Re: [Talk-us] Remap-a-tron level 2 complete! Suggestions for
> > level 3?
> >
> > > Level 4
> > >
> > > Tiger unedited roads that are "highway residentia
> From: Martijn van Exel [mailto:m...@rtijn.org]
> Sent: Friday, September 28, 2012 8:29 AM
> Subject: Re: [Talk-us] Remap-a-tron level 2 complete! Suggestions for
> level 3?
>
> > Level 4
> >
> > Tiger unedited roads that are "highway residential" and h
Nick,
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 12:36 AM, Nick Hocking wrote:
> Level 3
>
> Tiger 2012 roads, that are named, that don't have a corresponding OSM way
> with similar naming and similar geometry.
> This would pick up new 2012 Tiger roads, and unedited original Tiger named
> roads which were of poor
+1
Nick, maybe as a step before your suggestion.
1) New streets with no names. In Florida, there's a large number of new
streets that contributors have added, but did not add a name. The TIGER
2012 overlay helps make quick work of adding these names. In many cases,
streets will need to be spl
Level 3
Tiger 2012 roads, that are named, that don't have a corresponding OSM way
with similar naming and similar geometry.
This would pick up new 2012 Tiger roads, and unedited original Tiger named
roads which were of poor quality.
Level 4
Tiger unedited roads that are "highway residential" and
Hi all,
It looks like we're done with level 2 of the remap-a-tron!
(lima.schaaltreinen.nl/remap)
Thanks so much for helping out! You were so fast that I did not get a
chance to prepare the next level so now you get to have your say:
what should be the next error to fix with the remap-a-tron?
Cons
26 matches
Mail list logo