Re: [Talk-us] Territorial municipalities, Guam's villages (Max Erickson)

2017-07-18 Thread OSM Volunteer stevea
Guam now has its Municipalities entered as boundary=administrative + admin_level=6. I also changed several named and human-settled areas from place=locality (which means uninhabited) to place=hamlet. Hamlet seems appropriate as there appear to be no more than one or two hundred persons and

Re: [Talk-us] Territorial municipalities, Guam's villages (Max Erickson)

2017-07-18 Thread OSM Volunteer stevea
Josh Lee writes: "TIGER Line gives these village boundaries in the "County Subdivisions" file." Thank you, I'm taking a look now. Effectively closing this thread, SteveA California ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org

Re: [Talk-us] Territorial municipalities, Guam's villages (Max Erickson)

2017-07-18 Thread OSM Volunteer stevea
Thank you, Nelson.  Per the link (and a further link, which points to Simon Poole for the OSMF License Group):"But while neither CC nor the OSMF has undertaken a complete compatibility analysis, we have identified at least one  point of incompatibility and one possible challenge regarding

Re: [Talk-us] Territorial municipalities, Guam's villages (Max Erickson)

2017-07-18 Thread Kevin Kenny
On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 1:03 PM, OSM Volunteer stevea wrote: >> Max Erickson writes: >> >> The image the linked image was traced from provides no provenance >> (beyond "Own work"). It's tough to go from there to being sure that >> derived data is

Re: [Talk-us] Territorial municipalities, Guam's villages

2017-07-18 Thread Max Erickson
>> Max Erickson writes: >> >> The image the linked image was traced from provides no provenance >> (beyond "Own work"). It's tough to go from there to being sure that >> derived data is okay to contribute to OSM. > >It is explicitly CC BY-SA 4.0. Does OSM have a problem with that? > >SteveA

Re: [Talk-us] Territorial municipalities, Guam's villages (Max Erickson)

2017-07-18 Thread OSM Volunteer stevea
> Max Erickson writes: > > The image the linked image was traced from provides no provenance > (beyond "Own work"). It's tough to go from there to being sure that > derived data is okay to contribute to OSM. It is explicitly CC BY-SA 4.0. Does OSM have a problem with

Re: [Talk-us] Territorial municipalities, Guam's villages

2017-07-18 Thread Josh Lee
TIGER Line gives these village boundaries in the "County Subdivisions" file. https://www2.census.gov/geo/tiger/TIGER2016/COUSUB/tl_2016_66_cousub.zip The existing boundaries in Guam seem to be tagged as [boundary=census], since they're Census-Designated Places imported from an older version of

Re: [Talk-us] Territorial municipalities, Guam's villages

2017-07-18 Thread Max Erickson
The image the linked image was traced from provides no provenance (beyond "Own work"). It's tough to go from there to being sure that derived data is okay to contribute to OSM. Max ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org

[Talk-us] Territorial municipalities, Guam's villages

2017-07-17 Thread OSM Volunteer stevea
Does anybody know if the map of Guam's villages at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Villages_of_Guam#/media/File:Map_of_Guam_villages.svg is accurate and up-to-date? It's rough, but usable, and appears compatible with OSM's ODbL. Are there better data which OSM has permission to use? Guam's