The locals and the data have spoken; I'm dropping the building imports
for MD, PA and VT.
My goal here was to rely on automated processes to get the data into
shape, and I fear that even after size filtering, conflation and node
removal the building footprints are mostly not up to the level of
* William Morris wboyk...@geosprocket.com [2012-05-31 21:25 -0400]:
Trying this again, after a hiatus, here is a sample of a few hundred
buildings from a UVM-SAL land use classification. In this case it's
for an area just west of D.C. in Montgomery County, MD. I offer it for
your consideration
Fantastic. I'll give the plugin a run, along with some de-noding (is
orthogonalization worthwhile in this case?), and check back with folks. And
here's the pre-filtered buildings file county-wide (in .shp format still):
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/23616645/Geosprocket_Share/mont_bld_large.zip
From: Phil! Gold [mailto:phi...@pobox.com]
Subject: Re: [Talk-us] UVM-SAL Buildings
* William Morris wboyk...@geosprocket.com [2012-06-01 12:53 -0400]:
is orthogonalization worthwhile in this case?
I'm not sure it is. I tried using JOSM's orthogonalization tool on a
number of buildings
Howdy Folks,
Trying this again, after a hiatus, here is a sample of a few hundred
buildings from a UVM-SAL land use classification. In this case it's
for an area just west of D.C. in Montgomery County, MD. I offer it for
your consideration before I pull the import trigger:
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 9:25 PM, William Morris
wboyk...@geosprocket.com wrote:
Howdy Folks,
Trying this again, after a hiatus, here is a sample of a few hundred
buildings from a UVM-SAL land use classification. In this case it's
for an area just west of D.C. in Montgomery County, MD. I offer
I have a few specific comments, and some more general ones
From: William Morris [mailto:wboyk...@geosprocket.com]
Subject: [Talk-us] UVM-SAL Buildings
Howdy Folks,
Trying this again, after a hiatus, here is a sample of a few hundred
buildings from a UVM-SAL land use classification
7 matches
Mail list logo
