On Fri, 4 Sep 2015 21:40:57 -0400
Richard Welty wrote:
> On 9/4/15 5:09 PM, Ray Kiddy wrote:
> > So, there is nothing that a relation brings to the table that a way
> > does not? I mean, it is clear that for the purposes of drawing, they
> > are the same. But then are
On Fri, 4 Sep 2015 07:06:33 +0200
Marc Gemis wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 3:56 AM, Ray Kiddy wrote:
>
> > It has occurred to me that there will probably need to be a
> > "boundary watcher" tool, which can let an interested group know
> > about it
On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 1:37 PM, Ray Kiddy wrote:
>
> Strangely, I am finding that some of the cities in California _are_ in
> the system, but as ways and not as relations. This seems odd, but we
> will see.
Well the primary reason to use relations in boundaries is to reduce
On Fri, 4 Sep 2015 14:11:26 -0500
Toby Murray wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 1:37 PM, Ray Kiddy wrote:
> >
> > Strangely, I am finding that some of the cities in California _are_
> > in the system, but as ways and not as relations. This seems odd,
> >
On 9/4/15 5:09 PM, Ray Kiddy wrote:
> So, there is nothing that a relation brings to the table that a way
> does not? I mean, it is clear that for the purposes of drawing, they
> are the same. But then are they really just the same?
i don't know about the current style, but in the past there has
Hello -
I am on a quest to learn more about how administrative boundaries can
be managed as relations. I have a bit of experience with these
things, but I am discovering the limitations of my knowledge also.
Which was the point, actually.
I would like to be able to suggest that governmental
The area you linked to has no boundary data in OSM. You don't state
this in your email but by pulling up the TIGER shapefile, it looks
like you are wanting school district boundaries? I see one runs
through the area you linked to, in the shapefile. School districts
were not imported into OSM. The
On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 3:56 AM, Ray Kiddy wrote:
> It has occurred to me that there will probably need to be a "boundary
> watcher" tool, which can let an interested group know about it when a
> boundary gets broken in some way. And I have started playing with the
> python
On Thu, 3 Sep 2015 18:51:50 -0500
Toby Murray wrote:
> The area you linked to has no boundary data in OSM. You don't state
> this in your email but by pulling up the TIGER shapefile, it looks
> like you are wanting school district boundaries? I see one runs
> through the
9 matches
Mail list logo