Many of the administrative boundaries imported from TIGER have a
place= tag that reflects the legal type of incorporation of the
municipality rather than a sensible value for the OSM place tag (which
would give some hint about the relative prominence of the place).
This confusion has gone under
Use border_type=* for this. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:border_type
Usage is spotty at best but it looks fairly consistent to me. For
example in Pennsylvania admin_level=8 can have a border_type of city,
township, borough, municipality(?), or town (there's just one "town").
In New
Max,
Can you give an example or better yet a overpass query that we can use to
view some in our back yard?
Thanks,
Clifford
On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 4:48 AM Max Erickson wrote:
> Many of the administrative boundaries imported from TIGER have a
> place= tag that reflects the legal type of
Just comparing relations with place= tags to the corresponding nodes works:
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/CjI
Obviously not an OSM place=city there.
Max
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
[trying this again]
Good morning,
I've never done a use-without-attribution case before, would like to get
some suggestions before I dive in. I'm pretty sure this is a "substantial"
violation.
It seems that US News & World Report is using OSM data/maps without
attribution in their Health
On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 11:51 AM Steve Friedl wrote:
> So, I think I should be following the procedure here:
>
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lacking_proper_attribution
>
> with a polite note to them.
>
> Am I on the right track?
>
Yep! Feel free to shoot them a polite email asking to
6 matches
Mail list logo
