Thanks for the overpass query which really helps. As far as I'm concerned,
you can remove the tag.
Clifford
On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 7:49 AM Max Erickson wrote:
> Just comparing relations with place= tags to the corresponding nodes works:
>
> http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/CjI
>
> Obviously not an
Hi All - while learning about the US Census a few years ago, I found a slide
set (pdf) called Understanding Place by Michael Ratcliffe. Geography Division
of the US Census Bureau .. maybe something in that talk would shed light
here.. I have a copy and can send it on request... probably
Just comparing relations with place= tags to the corresponding nodes works:
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/CjI
Obviously not an OSM place=city there.
Max
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
Max,
Can you give an example or better yet a overpass query that we can use to
view some in our back yard?
Thanks,
Clifford
On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 4:48 AM Max Erickson wrote:
> Many of the administrative boundaries imported from TIGER have a
> place= tag that reflects the legal type of
Use border_type=* for this. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:border_type
Usage is spotty at best but it looks fairly consistent to me. For
example in Pennsylvania admin_level=8 can have a border_type of city,
township, borough, municipality(?), or town (there's just one "town").
In New
Many of the administrative boundaries imported from TIGER have a
place= tag that reflects the legal type of incorporation of the
municipality rather than a sensible value for the OSM place tag (which
would give some hint about the relative prominence of the place).
This confusion has gone under
6 matches
Mail list logo
