Re: [OSM-talk] [OSM-talk-be] IMPORTANT - OSM API upgrade - Upgrade finished
Ben Laenen wrote: The server is now back into a usable state, if you want to start mapping again. Little warning though: relations are completely broken with Potlatch. Don't do anything with relations in there until it's fixed or you may completely destroy existing relations. In fact I think it's safer to not use Potlatch at all for now because you even can't see if you might break something... This is all a myth sent out by the anti-potlatch people /funny On a serious note: I assume most users don't read the mailinglists. If it is such a large problem, editting with potlatch should be disabled for as long as this is not fixed. Maarten ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] [OSM-talk-be] IMPORTANT - OSM API upgrade - Upgrade finished
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 12:19 PM, Maarten Deen md...@xs4all.nl wrote: Ben Laenen wrote: The server is now back into a usable state, if you want to start mapping again. Little warning though: relations are completely broken with Potlatch. Don't do anything with relations in there until it's fixed or you may completely destroy existing relations. In fact I think it's safer to not use Potlatch at all for now because you even can't see if you might break something... This is all a myth sent out by the anti-potlatch people /funny On a serious note: I assume most users don't read the mailinglists. If it is such a large problem, editting with potlatch should be disabled for as long as this is not fixed. I wouldn't recommend that as a course of action - it's like throwing the baby out with the bathwater. Given that we're keeping the histories then fixing up a few broken relations is much less bad than preventing all editing through a major editor for a few days. Cheers, Andy ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] [OSM-talk-be] IMPORTANT - OSM API upgrade - Upgrade finished
Ben Laenen wrote: Little warning though: relations are completely broken with Potlatch. We think we've found the issue. More in half an hour, hopefully. cheers Richard -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A--OSM-talk-be--IMPORTANT---OSM-API-upgrade---Upgrade-finished-tp23174315p23175635.html Sent from the OpenStreetMap - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] [OSM-talk-be] IMPORTANT - OSM API upgrade - Upgrade finished
I wrote: We think we've found the issue. More in half an hour, hopefully. Fixed (hopefully) and committed. Will be live later when Tom has a chance to deploy it. For those interested, the database was changed in 0.6 to store relation members as 'Way', 'Node' or 'Relation'. Previously they were stored as 'way', 'node' and 'relation' (I've now updated the wiki documentation to say this), and Potlatch was still expecting that. cheers Richard -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A--OSM-talk-be--IMPORTANT---OSM-API-upgrade---Upgrade-finished-tp23174315p23175791.html Sent from the OpenStreetMap - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
