Re: [OSM-talk] [Talk-us] changeset: 89516909

2020-08-18 Thread Wayne Emerson, Jr. via talk
I wasn't saying you should import it. You were disputing about which dataset was more accurate. The County GIS is usually the best. You could compare the 2 in dispute, and use the county data to settle the argument. Many TIGER Lines are better now but in the past have been greatly scorned for

Re: [OSM-talk] [Talk-us] changeset: 89516909

2020-08-18 Thread 80hnhtv4agou--- via talk
i was told i could not use do to licence GIS to.   >Tuesday, August 18, 2020 8:38 PM -05:00 from Brian M. Sperlongano >: >  >All, >  >I fixed this boundary relation and also one neighboring town (Wheeling, IL) >using the Cook County, Illinois GIS as the data source, and re-used all of the

Re: [OSM-talk] [Talk-us] changeset: 89516909

2020-08-18 Thread 80hnhtv4agou--- via talk
>Tuesday, August 18, 2020 8:23 PM -05:00 from John D. : >  >i was told i could not use non OSM licenses.  > >  >>Tuesday, August 18, 2020 8:19 PM -05:00 from "Wayne Emerson, Jr. via talk" < >>talk@openstreetmap.org >: >>  >>Cook County GIS most likely has the most authoritative dataset. You can

Re: [OSM-talk] [Talk-us] changeset: 89516909

2020-08-18 Thread Wayne Emerson, Jr. via talk
Cook County GIS most likely has the most authoritative dataset. You can download it here: https://hub-cookcountyil.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/534226c6b1034985aca1e14a2eb234af_2?geometry=-88.214%2C42.072%2C-87.560%2C42.161 On 8/18/2020 8:51 PM, Mike Thompson wrote: On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at

Re: [OSM-talk] [Talk-us] changeset: 89516909

2020-08-18 Thread 80hnhtv4agou--- via talk
lines no relations yes   >Tuesday, August 18, 2020 7:52 PM -05:00 from Mike Thompson >: >  >    >On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 6:42 PM 80hnhtv4agou--- via Talk-us < >talk...@openstreetmap.org > wrote: >>i will fix anything that i missed but the lines are truth. >>  >>and it is not a polygon, >As

Re: [OSM-talk] [Talk-us] changeset: 89516909

2020-08-18 Thread Mike Thompson
On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 6:42 PM 80hnhtv4agou--- via Talk-us < talk...@openstreetmap.org> wrote: > i will fix anything that i missed but the lines are truth. > > and it is not a polygon, > As far as I know, boundary relations have to, in effect, be polygons, in other words, they have to close. >

Re: [OSM-talk] [Talk-us] changeset: 89516909

2020-08-18 Thread 80hnhtv4agou--- via talk
i will fix anything that i missed but the lines are truth.   and it is not a polygon, and i broke nothing i fixed what the other guy broke and did it all by hand.   >Tuesday, August 18, 2020 7:36 PM -05:00 from James Umbanhowar >: >  >I'm going to bow out of this discussion. The boundary

Re: [OSM-talk] [Talk-us] changeset: 89516909

2020-08-18 Thread Clay Smalley
Do you have a more authoritative source for municipal boundaries than the US Census Bureau? If you don't, it'll be hard for you to convince everyone here that the US Census data is wrong. On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 5:03 PM 80hnhtv4agou--- via Talk-us < talk...@openstreetmap.org> wrote: > FYI; > >

Re: [OSM-talk] [Talk-us] changeset: 89516909

2020-08-18 Thread 80hnhtv4agou--- via talk
FYI;   for all of you who are not in country and do not understand about usa city  bounders.   https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/geography/contact.html   and did you read what the other guy said, this is the census data not true map data.   https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/89598349