Re: [OSM-talk] External contact channels and GDPR

[Simon Poole]

Isn't this a bit a "what if"?

Definitely the OSMF is not requiring or asking anybody to discuss topics
on media that are not operated by the foundation and as you know
provides a variety of options (changeset comments, diaries, mailing
lists and forums) that can be used without involving third parties. iD
now suggests options that are not OSMF operated, but that content is not
curated by the OSMF.

Further the intro to the privacy policy actually touches on the issue
https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Privacy_Policy

Simon

Am 17.04.2018 um 07:51 schrieb Andrew Hain:
> The issue would be that we are asking someone to trust an external
> provider. At worst we could be responsible for propagating their
> noncompliance with the GDPR.
>
> --
> Andrewm
> 
> *From:* Kathleen Lu <kathleen...@mapbox.com>
> *Sent:* 16 April 2018 23:11:11
> *To:* Andrew Hain
> *Cc:* talk@openstreetmap.org
> *Subject:* Re: [OSM-talk] External contact channels and GDPR
>  
> Hi Andrew,
> It's not clear to me why GDPR would make it unacceptable in general to
> ask someone to discuss something, whether a controversial edit or not,
> in one forum or another, OSMF or not. What would be the concern?
> -Kathleen
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 9:18 PM Andrew Hain
> <andrewhain...@hotmail.co.uk <mailto:andrewhain...@hotmail.co.uk>> wrote:
>
> When we ask mappers to discuss controversial edits or imports is
> it ever acceptable under GDPR to direct people to a contact
> channel that is not directly run by the OSMF?
>
> --
> Andrew
> ___
> talk mailing list
> talk@openstreetmap.org <mailto:talk@openstreetmap.org>
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>
>
>
> ___
> talk mailing list
> talk@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [OSM-talk] External contact channels and GDPR

[Andrew Hain]

The issue would be that we are asking someone to trust an external provider. At 
worst we could be responsible for propagating their noncompliance with the GDPR.

--
Andrewm

From: Kathleen Lu <kathleen...@mapbox.com>
Sent: 16 April 2018 23:11:11
To: Andrew Hain
Cc: talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] External contact channels and GDPR

Hi Andrew,
It's not clear to me why GDPR would make it unacceptable in general to ask 
someone to discuss something, whether a controversial edit or not, in one forum 
or another, OSMF or not. What would be the concern?
-Kathleen


On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 9:18 PM Andrew Hain 
<andrewhain...@hotmail.co.uk<mailto:andrewhain...@hotmail.co.uk>> wrote:
When we ask mappers to discuss controversial edits or imports is it ever 
acceptable under GDPR to direct people to a contact channel that is not 
directly run by the OSMF?

--
Andrew
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org<mailto:talk@openstreetmap.org>
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [OSM-talk] External contact channels and GDPR

[Kathleen Lu]

Hi Andrew,
It's not clear to me why GDPR would make it unacceptable in general to ask
someone to discuss something, whether a controversial edit or not, in one
forum or another, OSMF or not. What would be the concern?
-Kathleen


On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 9:18 PM Andrew Hain 
wrote:

> When we ask mappers to discuss controversial edits or imports is it ever
> acceptable under GDPR to direct people to a contact channel that is not
> directly run by the OSMF?
>
> --
> Andrew
> ___
> talk mailing list
> talk@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk