Re: [OSM-talk] Quality in rural areas (Was: [Analytics] February 15, 2017 Research Showcase)

2017-02-15 Thread Andy Townsend 

On 15/02/2017 13:29, Jean-Marc Liotier wrote:

Node density, adjusted for population density, 2014:
https://i.imgur.com/hBNEGNT.png (found at
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7958598) - I would love to see
that updated. Variance seems higher in low population area. Would edit
density or tag density be better indicators than node density ?


Personally, I suspect that both would be better than raw node density.  
What'd also be interesting would be to exclude things that have been 
imported and just left there (or maybe just exclude v1 of everything?).


Best Regards,

Andy


___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [OSM-talk] Quality in rural areas (Was: [Analytics] February 15, 2017 Research Showcase)

2017-02-15 Thread Jean-Marc Liotier 
On Tue, 14 Feb 2017 21:03:32 -0800
Pine W  wrote:
>
> We find that in Wikipedia (as well as > OpenStreetMap), peer-produced
> content about rural areas is of systematically lower quality

Node density, adjusted for population density, 2014:
https://i.imgur.com/hBNEGNT.png (found at
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7958598) - I would love to see
that updated. Variance seems higher in low population area. Would edit
density or tag density be better indicators than node density ?

___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk