Re: [Taps] draft-ietf-taps-interface-05 review

See in-line On 05/03/2020 07:30, Michael Welzl wrote: Hi, A few comments in line: On Mar 4, 2020, at 5:51 PM, Philipp S. Tiesel > wrote: Hi, Some of the remaining issues had already been discussed, but either did not lead to text or the text was lost. Let me

Re: [Taps] draft-ietf-taps-interface-05 review

Hi, A few comments in line: > On Mar 4, 2020, at 5:51 PM, Philipp S. Tiesel wrote: > > Hi, > > Some of the remaining issues had already been discussed, but either did not > lead to text or the text was lost. Let me comment on these issues: > >>> On 4. Mar 2020, at 15:38, Michael Welzl

Re: [Taps] draft-ietf-taps-interface-05 review

Hi, Some of the remaining issues had already been discussed, but either did not lead to text or the text was lost. Let me comment on these issues: >> On 4. Mar 2020, at 15:38, Michael Welzl wrote: > > REMAINING UNADDRESSED COMMENTS FROM KYLE ROSE: > > > 2. Terminology and Notation > > *

Re: [Taps] draft-ietf-taps-interface-05 review

Dear Kyle, Thanks so much for all your comments - and sorry for taking so long to get back to you! I decided to begin attacking them now with a PR. Please see: https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/pull/514 for the comments that I tried to address, my answers to them, and the changes that