On 11/04/2021 15:13, Aaron Falk wrote:
Working group last call for the API draft starts now. Please review
the draft and send comments to the list (including ‘ready to publish’
affirmations) or post issues/PRs to github
<https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts>. Thanks to the authors,
editors, and reviewers who’ve helped bring the draft to this point!
Forwarded message:
From: IETF Secretariat ietf-secretariat-re...@ietf.org
<mailto:ietf-secretariat-re...@ietf.org>
To: draft-ietf-taps-interf...@ietf.org
<mailto:draft-ietf-taps-interf...@ietf.org>, taps-cha...@ietf.org
<mailto:taps-cha...@ietf.org>
Subject: IETF WG state changed for draft-ietf-taps-interface
Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2021 07:05:50 -0700
The IETF WG state of draft-ietf-taps-interface has been changed to
"In WG
Last Call" from "WG Document" by Aaron Falk:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-taps-interface/
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-taps-interface/>
_______________________________________________
Taps mailing list
Taps@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps
I've just read this carefully, and it seems nearly ready to me.
I did notice a few issues, now in github:
Some of which relate to text from text I originally proposed (sorry):
No Segmentation #782
More thoughts on network Fragmentation #781
To me, Safely Replayable text seems unclear ( 7.1.3.4.) #780
UDP-Lite and Zero UDP Checksum (sect 6.1.1 and 7.1.3.6) #776
Editorial:
Priority property "represents a hierarchy of priorities"? #779
Update ref to dplpmtud #778
Editorial: is Constant-Rate Streaming a path characteristic or appl
traffic? #777
There could be more definitions@ API #775
What is "entangled"? #774
Editorial API NiT #773
Is Appendix A actually implementation? #772
Gorry
_______________________________________________
Taps mailing list
Taps@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps
