Re: [Taps] document progress update?

I'd have thought it was worth seeing if FECFRAME fits as something to talk about. It is used in places. There are transport concerns that differ and could be highlighted - because some uses require pre-provisioned capacity (aka, do not have CC), so we probably need to say something about

Re: [Taps] document progress update?

Hello everybody, >> • Vincent Roca will write something about FLUTE based on NORM > > - took a quick look at this, it looks good. Vincent also sent a suggestion > that we mention FECFRAME here, though no integration-ready text. I can provide some FECFRAME

Re: [Taps] document progress update?

hi Aaron, the status is pretty much "August is over and people are finally back from vacation, and are dusting off their inboxes." On specific points: > On 03 Sep 2015, at 21:09, Aaron Falk wrote: > > TAPS Editors- > > Can you provide an update on the draft revisions

Re: [Taps] document progress update?

Ah, didn't see this was sent to the list, so: >> On 03 Sep 2015, at 21:09, Aaron Falk wrote: >> >> From the minutes I have the following changes (this may not be complete): >> • Karen & Michael will add some text on SCTP > > - will twist arms tomorrow or Tuesday. >

Re: [Taps] document progress update?

> On 03 Sep 2015, at 21:14, Brian Trammell wrote: > > Ah, didn't see this was sent to the list, so: > > >>> On 03 Sep 2015, at 21:09, Aaron Falk wrote: >>> >>> From the minutes I have the following changes (this may not be complete): >>> • Karen &