[Taps] I-D on Problem Statement Regarding IPv6 Address Usage (draft-gont-6man-address-usage-recommendations-04)

(hence the filename). But at least for the time being, we decided to better focus on the problem statement first. Any comments will be very appreciated -- including whether the topic itself might be of interest to this group. Thanks! Best regards, -- Fernando Gont SI6 Networks e-mail: fg

Re: [Taps] IPv6 address usage problem statement?

. Thanks so much for your comments! I this work is of interest to the TAPS WG, we could try to move this one forward in this wg, and also think of a subsequent I-D with recommendations (more on this later). Thoughts? Thanks! Cheers, -- Fernando Gont SI6 Networks e-mail: fg...@si6networks.com PGP Fin

Re: [Taps] IPv6 address usage

ld provide the mechanisms that allow apps/OSes t make the tradeoffs. But everything starts with understanding the problem, and understanding the tradeoffs. Thanks, -- Fernando Gont SI6 Networks e-mail: fg...@si6networks.com PGP Fingerprint: 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492 ___

Re: [Taps] IPv6 address usage

g, one might think f "one address per module" (whatever that is), or one address per process/thread... but I'm not sure I'd default to "one address per connection". I think that there might only be specific cases/scenarios where one might want to do this. Thanks, -- Fernando Gont

Re: [Taps] IPv6 address usage

rtainly, one address per application would be a more sensible default. However, I'm of the idea that whatever default one picks is the result of an analysys of tradeoffs, and not the other way around. -- Fernando Gont SI6 Networks e-mail: fg...@si6networks.com PGP Fingerprint: 31

Re: [Taps] Progress on address usage documents

uable input but I don't think we should be the venue for > it's development. FWIW, I brought this to taps upon suggestion I got on 6man... Thanks! CHeers, -- Fernando Gont SI6 Networks e-mail: fg...@si6networks.com PGP Fingerprint: 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492

[Taps] Progress on address usage documents

shedding some light on how we could make a better usage of the available addreses. Chairs: Do you think it would be reasonable to poll the wg for adoption of these two documents? Thanks! Best regards, -- Fernando Gont SI6 Networks e-mail: fg...@si6networks.com PGP Fingerprint: 31C6 D484 63B2

Re: [Taps] Progress on address usage documents

me that does look a lot like source address > selection in TAPS. There could be useful input here to a few paras in > the TAPS architecture. It's not clear to me that would require a new > draft though in TAPS to achieve this. Could you please rovide a reference to the document so that I can ta

Re: [Taps] Progress on address usage documents

at least there seems to be a disconnect. Address properties, selection > and lifetimes are not dealt with well (if at all) by transport layer and > application implementations. FWIW, that's my take as well. Thanks, -- Fernando Gont SI6 Networks e-mail: fg...@si6networks.com PGP Fingerprint: 31C6 D4

Re: [Taps] IPv6 address usage

Hello, Erik, On 03/21/2018 05:47 PM, Erik Kline wrote: > On 21 March 2018 at 09:58, Fernando Gont <fg...@si6networks.com> wrote: >> Folks, >> >> Based on the feedback received today, I have split our document >> <https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-gont-

[Taps] IPv6 address usage

raft-gont-taps-sockets-api-limitations-00.txt> * Analysis of IPv6 address properties: <https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-gont-taps-address-analysis-00.txt> Your feedback will be appreciated. We'd also appreciate guidance on how to move forward. :-) Thanks! Best regards, --

Re: [Taps] Call for agenda items

posed agenda item: * Title: "Problem Statement Regarding IPv6 Address Usage" * Filename: draft-gont-taps-address-usage-problem-statement-00 * Presenter: Fernando Gont * Topic to be discussed: Whether the topic is of interest for this wg, and possibly adopting the I-D as wg document

[Taps] Problem Statement Regarding IPv6 Address Usage (Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-gont-taps-address-usage-problem-statement-00.txt)

mments will be appreciated. Thanks! Best regards, Fernando Forwarded Message Subject: New Version Notification for draft-gont-taps-address-usage-problem-statement-00.txt Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2018 03:46:50 -0800 From: internet-dra...@ietf.org To: Fernando Gont <fg...@si6net

Re: [Taps] IPv6 address usage problem statement?

yments. How could one accommodate such deployments? (ignoring them eventually means that the network admins needs to figure out his own hack) Thanks, -- Fernando Gont SI6 Networks e-mail: fg...@si6networks.com PGP Fingerprint: 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492 ___ Taps mailing list Taps@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps

Re: [Taps] IPv6 address usage problem statement?

On 02/13/2018 08:30 PM, Erik Kline wrote: > On 13 February 2018 at 15:15, Fernando Gont <fg...@si6networks.com> wrote: >> Hello, Tommy, >> >> On 02/13/2018 08:04 PM, Tommy Pauly wrote: >>> Yes, I think this topic is very relevant to the work that can b

[Taps] Some comments on draft-ietf-taps-impl-12

tacker might require "a lot of work" from a server without even proving that it can receive the return packets. Thanks! Cheers, -- Fernando Gont SI6 Networks e-mail: fg...@si6networks.com PGP Fingerprint: F242 FF0E A804 AF81 EB10 2F07 7CA1 321D 663B B494 __

[Taps] Some comments on draft-ietf-taps-interface

MHO deserve discussion. And aside from the regular address systems normally configure, if one were to specify an API one would probably want to provide a mechanism for apps to be able to request sole/single-use addresses (.e.g., one address per app or container). Thoughts? Thanks! Regards, --

Re: [Taps] Some comments on draft-ietf-taps-impl-12

something else you were expecting to see in the text? Looks like I got confused -- my bad, sorry! -- No changes expected here. Thanks, -- Fernando Gont SI6 Networks e-mail: fg...@si6networks.com PGP Fingerprint: F242 FF0E A804 AF81 EB10 2F07 7CA1 321D 663B B494 __