Re: Big initial upload

2016-06-29 Thread Garance AE Drosehn
> On Jun 29, 2016, at 2:33 AM, Gregory Orange > wrote: > > I'm considering tarsnap for our backups. I am mildly concerned about our > Internet uplink speed to get the data to tarsnap on a nightly basis, ... > > The numbers are in the order of 1TB of data over Australian ADSL at a maximum > o

Re: Big initial upload

2016-06-29 Thread Bennett Piater
> Anyway, if the initial upload is big enough to be a problem, then IMO > it's best to consider whether the restore after a sizable data loss will > be fast enough to make tarsnap a viable possibility in this particular > case. Tarsnap is great if viable, IMO, but the time to restore can be a > pro

Re: Big initial upload

2016-06-29 Thread Gregory Orange
On 29/06/16 16:00, Dave Cottlehuber wrote: This might be an option*waves hands vigorously* --snip-- data -> HDD -> AusPost -> S3 -> EC2 -> tarsnap, manipulate cache and keys Thanks Dave, my mind wandered in that direction and I did wonder if AWS would accept postal delivery. At $job-1 we acce

Re: Big initial upload

2016-06-29 Thread Arnt Gulbrandsen
je...@tr2.com writes: Maybe there's a niche here for another small business. Somebody with a speedy internet connection could accept thumb drives or hard disks by mail, and upchuck them into the cloud. http://aws.amazon.com/importexport/ exists. But I think it would be difficult to use that w

Re: Big initial upload

2016-06-29 Thread jerry
Maybe there's a niche here for another small business. Somebody with a speedy internet connection could accept thumb drives or hard disks by mail, and upchuck them into the cloud. - Jerry Kaidor On 06/29/2016 00:29, Colin Percival wrote: On 06/28/16 23:33, Gregory Orange w

Re: Big initial upload

2016-06-29 Thread Dave Cottlehuber
On Wed, 29 Jun 2016, at 09:29, Colin Percival wrote: > On 06/28/16 23:33, Gregory Orange wrote: > > The numbers are in the order of 1TB of data over Australian ADSL at a > > maximum > > of 1 megabit per second uplink. By my reckoning, that might finish in 36 > > hours, but is more likely to be dou

Re: Big initial upload

2016-06-29 Thread Gregory Orange
On 29/06/16 15:29, Colin Percival wrote: On 06/28/16 23:33, Gregory Orange wrote: https://www.google.ca/webhp?#q=1+TB+%2F+1+mbps 92.59 days I'm not sure how you got 36 hours...? *facepalm* Yeah it didn't sound right, and I knew I should have just left the numbers out! I think it was poor use o

Re: Big initial upload

2016-06-29 Thread Colin Percival
On 06/28/16 23:33, Gregory Orange wrote: > The numbers are in the order of 1TB of data over Australian ADSL at a maximum > of 1 megabit per second uplink. By my reckoning, that might finish in 36 > hours, but is more likely to be double that. https://www.google.ca/webhp?#q=1+TB+%2F+1+mbps 92.59 d

Big initial upload

2016-06-28 Thread Gregory Orange
Hi tarsnap folks, I'm considering tarsnap for our backups. I am mildly concerned about our Internet uplink speed to get the data to tarsnap on a nightly basis, but I am much more concerned about that same uplink for initially getting all of the data uploaded. I've trawled through the mailing l