Re: Client-side deduplication during extraction

2017-11-20 Thread James Cass
+1 for me. This sounds like a good idea. That's my 2 satoshis. :-) On Sun, Nov 19, 2017 at 8:03 PM, Colin Percival wrote: > On 11/19/17 12:37, Robie Basak wrote: > > On Sat, Apr 08, 2017 at 07:52:54PM -0700, Colin Percival wrote: > >> On 04/04/17 13:06, Robie Basak

Re: Client-side deduplication during extraction

2017-11-19 Thread Colin Percival
On 11/19/17 12:37, Robie Basak wrote: > On Sat, Apr 08, 2017 at 07:52:54PM -0700, Colin Percival wrote: >> On 04/04/17 13:06, Robie Basak wrote: >>> Since the redundancy is there and my client has all the details, >>> is there any way I can take advantage of this? >> >> Not right now. This is

Re: Client-side deduplication during extraction

2017-11-19 Thread Robie Basak
On Sat, Apr 08, 2017 at 07:52:54PM -0700, Colin Percival wrote: > On 04/04/17 13:06, Robie Basak wrote: > > I'd like to retrieve and permanently archive (offline) a full set of > > archives stored with one particular key using Tarsnap. > > > > These are of course deduplicated at Tarsnap's end.

Re: Client-side deduplication during extraction

2017-04-08 Thread Colin Percival
Hi Robie, On 04/04/17 13:06, Robie Basak wrote: > I'd like to retrieve and permanently archive (offline) a full set of > archives stored with one particular key using Tarsnap. > > These are of course deduplicated at Tarsnap's end. But if I download > them one at at time (using something like