Thank you for the detailed explanation, Graham.
> could be DICOM images (which include compression)
Yes, they are from a CT Scan.
> text form or "Training Center XML",
Yes.
> reduction of 1.45 GB to 1.07 GB for the initial archive, on the data you
> provided, looks quite reasonable".
This
On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 06:58:43PM -, a...@sdf.org wrote:
> Sorry for the delay. Here's the file type distribution (some are unknown;
> I just shared as powershell printed):
Thanks! This looks quite reasonable to me. Just to keep the data together, in
another email you wrote:
> I am
Hi Graham,
Sorry for the delay. Here's the file type distribution (some are unknown;
I just shared as powershell printed):
Extension Size (MB) Count
- - -
txt 7.88 630
236.45 846
plist 0.2813
doentry 0.01 5
jpg
On Thu, Sep 07, 2017 at 03:55:07PM -0400, Garance AE Drosehn wrote:
> > Depending on just how paranoid you are, and how disciplined you are,
> > you can have multiple machines deduplicate to a common store, as long
> > as you only have one running at a time.
>
> Hmm. Yes, that's an interesting
> On Sep 7, 2017, at 2:54 PM, Scott Robison wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 11:55 AM, Garance AE Drosehn wrote:
>>
>> De-duplication works great in some other situations because the other
>> service is de-duplicating files across (say) 20 different Windows machines.
On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 11:55 AM, Garance AE Drosehn
wrote:
>
>> On Sep 7, 2017, at 4:21 AM, a...@sdf.org wrote:
>>
>>> So, can I make it smaller than 1.07 GB? Am I doing something wrong? I can
>>> explain what kind data are part of those 1.45 GB (can give a breakup too
>>>
On Thu, Sep 07, 2017 at 08:21:42AM -, a...@sdf.org wrote:
> I believe too much feedback in my last mail might have been off-putting
> and judgemental (and kinda unsolicited advice) :-) Or not.
Hi Amar,
No, your previous mail wasn't too judgemental at all! Sorry for the delay.
> > I am
Hi,
Thanks again.
> 2. You started a backup for said Job at 00-57-08 and then another which
> failed with:
> [18/08/17 1:04 AM] Backup Job_weekly tarsnap backup_2017-08-18_01-04-30
> failed: tarsnap: Transaction already in progress
I was not aware of this. I didn't get any notifications/prompt
On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 06:55:54AM -, a...@sdf.org wrote:
> Also, I see 0 archives. I am wondering why no archives were created.
> Because when I created a backup it goes to "Backup" tab and when I create
> a job it goes to "Jobs" tab. Nothing ever shows up in "Archives". Neither
> did