Re: Thread watchers (was: The Bat! - suggestions)

2000-10-11 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Ming-Li, On Wed, 11 Oct 2000 05:27:32 -0700 GMT (11/10/2000, 20:27 +0800 GMT), Ming-Li wrote: How long do other programs "kill" or "watch" the thread? ML As long as the thread lives. Quesstion: how long is that? ML In Agent, there's no special database for this. When retrieving new

Re: The Bat! - suggestions

2000-10-11 Thread A . Curtis Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 11 Oct 2000 15:45:06 +0200, Christian Lange wrote: Signal String: String : ^In-reply-To.+@kasnet\.com$ Location: Kludges Presence: Yes CL wouldn't this still trigger for any reply to someone at

Re: The Bat! - suggestions

2000-10-11 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Marck, On Wed, 11 Oct 2000 13:44:50 +0100 GMT (11/10/2000, 20:44 +0800 GMT), Marck D. Pearlstone wrote: MDP The best way to catch a message which is a reply to one of yours in MDP *this* list is to pick up the In-reply-To reference to a formula3 MDP message ID. MDP String

Re: a href=mailto:

2000-10-11 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Michal, On Wed, 11 Oct 2000 16:20:44 +0200 GMT (11/10/2000, 22:20 +0800 GMT), Michal Kosinski wrote: MK Try this one to reproduce: MK mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?SUBJECT=testing TB! mailto field MK How does it suppose to be? mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?SUBJECT=testing%20TB!%20mailto%20field

Re: The Bat! - suggestions

2000-10-11 Thread Christian Lange
Hello, CL wouldn't this still trigger for any reply to someone at your ISP? Yes it would. But it would be extremely unusual for this to be of practical concern. I disagree here. I am on more than one mailing list, with quite active members who share the same ISP. And even though I wouldn't

Re: The Bat! - suggestions

2000-10-11 Thread A . Curtis Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 11 Oct 2000 16:38:10 +0200, Christian Lange wrote: Yes it would. But it would be extremely unusual for this to be of practical concern. CL I disagree here. I am on more than one mailing list, with quite active CL members who share the

Re: Thread watchers (was: The Bat! - suggestions)

2000-10-11 Thread Ming-Li
On Wednesday, October 11, 2000, 6:44:22 AM, Thomas wrote: So it checks for each new message coming in whether this thread already exists somewhere in the message base and has been marked "ignore"? This can be awfully slow when you have thousands of messages, if I understand you correctly.

Re: The Bat! - suggestions

2000-10-11 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello A, On Wed, 11 Oct 2000 09:51:07 -0500 GMT (11/10/2000, 22:51 +0800 GMT), A . Curtis Martin wrote: TF You are right, since I am the one receiving the message, my name and TF my ISP will be in the headers in any case. However, do all clients TF work with the In-reply-to header, is this

Re: Thread watchers (was: The Bat! - suggestions)

2000-10-11 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Ming-Li, On Wed, 11 Oct 2000 07:59:38 -0700 GMT (11/10/2000, 22:59 +0800 GMT), Ming-Li wrote: So it checks for each new message coming in whether this thread already exists somewhere in the message base and has been marked "ignore"? This can be awfully slow when you have thousands of

Re[4]: [OT] Backup program - was - Re: announcing LifeZzaver for The Bat!

2000-10-11 Thread Wolfgang Kynast
Hello István, ... IS The probable reason for SC being slower is that it only copies changed IS files, so it checks for changes first. The same thing does the COPY /U command option of 4DOS. BTW, backing up a large dir (my news base) took about one hour with SC - in runs in max. 5 minutes now.

Re: The Bat! - suggestions

2000-10-11 Thread A . Curtis Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 11 Oct 2000 23:06:57 +0800, Thomas Fernandez wrote: TF That's what I'm saying g. While I personally filter only messages TF "from" myself (to mark them read), not messages "to" myself, I think TF it would work only if my name actually is in

Re: Thread watchers (was: The Bat! - suggestions)

2000-10-11 Thread Ming-Li
On Wednesday, October 11, 2000, 8:28:08 AM, Thomas wrote: ML In Agent, no. At least I don't feel it. AFAIK, all news ML messages carry full thread references in the headers (am I ML right?), so all Agent has to do before retrieving new messages ML of a group is to quickly scan through all the

Re[2]: The Bat! - suggestions

2000-10-11 Thread Chris Wilson
Wednesday, October 11, 2000, 3:18:02 PM, you wrote: Hello Marck, On Wed, 11 Oct 2000 13:44:50 +0100 GMT (11/10/2000, 20:44 +0800 GMT), Marck D. Pearlstone wrote: MDP The best way to catch a message which is a reply to one of yours in MDP *this* list is to pick up the In-reply-To reference

Re: The Bat! - suggestions

2000-10-11 Thread Ming-Li
On Wednesday, October 11, 2000, 8:35:39 AM, A. wrote: TF In-reply-to cannot be used, unless 1.) everybody uses an email TF client that uses the ehader, and 2.) everybody uses a different TF ISP (just see how many people on this list alone are on GMX, TF Hotmail, or Yahoo to make Christian's

Re: Thread watchers (was: The Bat! - suggestions)

2000-10-11 Thread A . Curtis Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 11 Oct 2000 08:54:59 -0700, Ming-Li wrote: ML That's even better. If you're serious in getting a newsreader ML (haven't you got one already?), though, I would suggest you start ML with Gravity or XNews, both having the same or similar