Marck D Pearlstone, [MDP] wrote:
MDP gpg: BAD signature from Allie C. Martin
Would you try this one? I suspect it's my mailserver doing some munging.
--
-= allie_M =- | List Moderator
PGPKeys: http://www.ac-martin.com/pgpkeys.html
Using TB! v2.01.49 on
Dierk Haasis, [DH] wrote:
DH Don't worry: I partly confirm. I don't get the AV but cannot sign
DH anymore, the message just sits there and waits for something.
That's what I get on the first attempt after starting TB!. When I try
signing on sending again the AV appears.
--
-= allie_M =- |
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Saturday, November 22, 2003/11:51:27 AM
RE: The Bat! v2.01.49 is now available
Greetings Allie,
On Saturday, November 22, 2003, 11:40:32 AM, you wrote:
MDP gpg: BAD signature from Allie C. Martin
Allie Would you try this one? I suspect it's my
Hello Eddie,
Saturday, November 22, 2003, 2:14:14 PM, you wrote:
Strange was that this file 'was market for deletion' when I looked up
at the Server with 'Ctrl-Alt-F2'. On the Advanced Tap the Filter is
set to 'Ignore'. Has someone else made this same observation? Could it
be a Bug?
Yes,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Allie,
On Sat, 22 Nov 2003 11:40:32 -0500 (11:40 AM here), Allie Martin [AM]
wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
AM Would you try this one? I suspect it's my mailserver doing some
AM munging.
gpg: Signature made 11/22/03 11:40:32 Eastern Standard
On 2003-11-22 at 17:40:32 Allie Martin wrote:
Would you try this one? I suspect it's my mailserver doing some munging.
Fine here, except for gpg's paranoid warnings of course:
gpg: Signature made 11/22/03 17:40:32 using DSA key ID 010721DC
gpg: Good signature from Allie C. Martin, Dr. [EMAIL
Hello Allie!
On Saturday, November 22, 2003 at 5:48:32 PM you wrote:
That's what I get on the first attempt after starting TB!. When I try
signing on sending again the AV appears.
Luckily I didn't have that problem, yet, as I didn't encounter another
message to be signed.
BTW, do you again
Hello Allie!
On Saturday, November 22, 2003 at 5:48:32 PM you wrote:
That's what I get on the first attempt after starting TB!. When I try
signing on sending again the AV appears.
Interesting, just tried signing with my other answer - and it worked
flawlessly.
Didn't have so much fun with a
Hello Dimitry,
Last night I wanted to go back to build 26 as I wrote; it worked for
the one message I wrote about it. Didn't work today.
I can confirm this finding. :( It seems b49 changes something in the
account and/or folder properties that is NOT backwards compatible.
Thanks for the
zaterdag 22 november 2003, 18:28:25 u::
Hallo,
I won't cheer too soon, but I just got a new reg.key. from TheBat! team and
all of a sudden things SEEM to go better.
I'll let you know if things remain this way or that this was just a lucky
minute or so. ;-)
--
-=/ Rubeo /=-
Hello Laura,
On Saturday, November 22, 2003 at 1:05:04 PM you [L] wrote (at least
in part):
CK I can't open the helpfile by pressing F1.
in English: The file ...\The Bat!\THE_BAT.CHM is not a windows help
file or is damaged.
L could it be you did not yet put your thebat.exe in the right
Hello Allen,
On 03 November 2003, 00:39 -0500 (22/11/2003 05:39 local time) Allen [A]
in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
MW The filter for Inbox - Known has the check box: Continue processing with
MW other filters. Setting isn't retained.
MW Can anyone confirm?
A I can confirm this -- indeed, the
Hello Eddie,
...I've being using very long v1.63b7.
Is there any work around?
Have you tried any of the released versions? Do you still have the
problem when using them?
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v2.01.3
Winamp OFF:
Hello, cs.
You wrote 23.11.2003 @ 1:29 in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
using mailer The Bat! (v2.01.7)
cdnn I won't cheer too soon, but I just got a new reg.key. from TheBat! team and
cdnn all of a sudden things SEEM to go better.
It seems that the registration key again changed (at least
On Saturday, November 22, 2003, 12:17 PM, you wrote:
I can confirm this finding. :( It seems b49 changes something in the
account and/or folder properties that is NOT backwards compatible.
GS Thanks for the update Dierk Dimitry. I think I'll sit with .26 until
GS more information is
Dierk Haasis, [DH] wrote:
DH BTW, do you again have a new key, you are shown as Unknown
DH Signer?
Yes, I have a new key, signed using my previous key that's now revoked.
I had to change keys because the encryption subkey expired and
recreating a new one caused some to still read that they key
16 matches
Mail list logo
