IMAP: deleted read messages appear as unred in "Trash"

2004-02-01 Thread Rojer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: MD5 Hello, fellow The Bat users! i've been reading this list or a while, but haven't seen anyone to discuss The Most Annoying Bug of The Bat IMAP Implementation. basically what happens is that i get the letter, have a glance at it and decide to move it to

Re: URL highlighting

2004-02-01 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Rojer, On Sun, 1 Feb 2004 18:16:53 +0300 GMT (01/02/2004, 22:16 +0700 GMT), Rojer wrote: PH>> AFAIK nothing has been changed at all to the DNS part. > The Bat! does parse URIs correctly. > an excerpt from the "Uniform Resource Identifiers (URI): Generic Syntax" > document ( http://www.ietf

Re: The Bat! v2.03 Beta/51 is now available

2004-02-01 Thread Avi Yashar
On Saturday, January 31, 2004, Stefan Tanurkov wrote: ST> [-] Bug with dispatching all messages on the server automatically ST> (introduced in 2.03 Beta) The Mail Dispatcher works correctly now. I have tested on both Windows XP and Windows 2000. (My AB templates also work correctly now, but t

Re: URL highlighting

2004-02-01 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Stefan, On Sun, 1 Feb 2004 16:38:00 +0200 GMT (01/02/2004, 21:38 +0700 GMT), Stefan Tanurkov wrote: > Accordingly to the URL standard, an URL MUST NOT contain characters > below the space and higher than ASCII 127 > I'm not sure whether something was changed by then, but I doubt it was > :

Re[3]: URL highlighting

2004-02-01 Thread Rojer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: MD5 ST>> I'm not sure whether something was changed by then, but I doubt it was PH> AFAIK nothing has been changed at all to the DNS part. The Bat! does parse URIs correctly. an excerpt from the "Uniform Resource Identifiers (URI): Generic Syntax" docume

Re: URL highlighting

2004-02-01 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Stefan, On Sun, 1 Feb 2004 16:38:00 +0200 GMT (01/02/2004, 21:38 +0700 GMT), Stefan Tanurkov wrote: > Accordingly to the URL standard, an URL MUST NOT contain characters > below the space and higher than ASCII 127 > I'm not sure whether something was changed by then, but I doubt it was > :

Re: URL highlighting

2004-02-01 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Dierk, On Sun, 1 Feb 2004 15:28:11 +0100 GMT (01/02/2004, 21:28 +0700 GMT), Dierk Haasis wrote: > Well ... it isn't long, is it? How about calling it a feature request: > Please, RITLabs, include support for special characters allowed in > URLs?! Surely a matter of philosophy. Feature req

Re[2]: URL highlighting

2004-02-01 Thread Peter Hampf
Hello Stefan, on Sun, 1 Feb 2004 16:38:00 +0200 GMT your local time you wrote: ST> I'm not sure whether something was changed by then, but I doubt it was AFAIK nothing has been changed at all to the DNS part. ST> Domain names with 8 bit characters should be encoded just like any ST> other chara

Re: URL highlighting

2004-02-01 Thread Stefan Tanurkov
Hello Thomas, Accordingly to the URL standard, an URL MUST NOT contain characters below the space and higher than ASCII 127 I'm not sure whether something was changed by then, but I doubt it was :-) Domain names with 8 bit characters should be encoded just like any other character outside the sp

Re: The Bat! v2.03 Beta/51 is now available

2004-02-01 Thread MaXxX
On Saturday, January 31, 2004, at 7:22:28 PM, fear chilled people's souls as Stefan Tanurkov whispered in a sinister voice: > OK, the fix is there :-) Sorry about the mess... Maybe you could try to fix the "when moving to a next unread message, SOMETIMES the previously selected message remains s

Re: URL highlighting

2004-02-01 Thread Dierk Haasis
Hello Thomas! On Sunday, February 1, 2004 at 3:05:32 PM you wrote: > When the URL doesn't use umlauts (i.e. has them encoded as above), > it's no problem. Only when the URL does contain them, as in my > example, you click on it on only the highlighted part is sent to your > browser. I consider th

Re: Feature request - "manual" junk mail filter

2004-02-01 Thread Ben Allen
Howdy Barnabas, Sunday, February 1, 2004, 1:01:04 AM, Barnabas wrotened: BB> when i realized that there was 4500 messages left in the source folder BB> (most of them spam) a question outlined in my head: is it possible to BB> manually start junk mail filters (Anti-SPAM plugins, especially BB> Ba

Re: URL highlighting

2004-02-01 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Zygmunt, On Sun, 1 Feb 2004 13:11:51 +0100 GMT (01/02/2004, 19:11 +0700 GMT), Zygmunt Wereszczynski wrote: >>> If someone can confirm, I'd consider it a bug, especially since >>> high-ASCII characters are allowed in Domain names now (even though the >>> abvove URL has always been valid).

Re: Trouble between PGP and TB

2004-02-01 Thread Günther Eisele
Hei, Dierk Haasis wrote: > Anybody else having similar problems? Yes. Correct decoding of base64 or qp coded mails is just working properly if you use the built-in pgp support. I also use the ckt version normally. The mail get's decrypted, but not decoded. -- Automatic and free virus scannin

Re: URL highlighting

2004-02-01 Thread Zygmunt Wereszczynski
On Sunday, February 1, 2004, at 13:11:51 [UTC+0100] (Sunday, February 1, 2004 13:11 my local time) I wrote: > Hmm, my Mozilla expand such URLs as > http://www.dict.cc/?s=au%DFergew%F6hnlich > and then The Bat! has no troubles. Sorry for double posting here. It was by mistake. -- Best regards, Z

Beta/50: Move to folder... corrupted local mailbase ?

2004-02-01 Thread Tero Ripattila
Hello folks, I moved some messages from an IMAP account that are located on another server to my personal IMAP server yesterday evening and all went quite fluently - only a few messages had to be selected again and told to be moved to get them actually transferred. For some reason, TB! tells me n

Re: URL highlighting

2004-02-01 Thread Zygmunt Wereszczynski
On Sunday, February 1, 2004, at 12:57:06 [UTC+0100] (Sunday, February 1, 2004 12:57 my local time) Dierk Haasis wrote: >> If someone can confirm, I'd consider it a bug, especially since >> high-ASCII characters are allowed in Domain names now (even though the >> abvove URL has always been valid).

Re: The priority of message templates?

2004-02-01 Thread Zygmunt Wereszczynski
On Sunday, February 1, 2004, at 22:04:37 [UTC+1100] (Sunday, February 1, 2004 12:04 my local time) Ian A. White wrote: DH>> IIRC (and excluding 2.03/50): AB template, then Folder template, then DH>> Account template. > Well, this may be if you open the address book and start a message > from ther

Re: The priority of message templates?

2004-02-01 Thread Ian A. White
Dierk, On Sunday, February 1, 2004, 9:58:42 PM, you (Dierk Haasis) wrote: DH> Hello Ian! DH> On Sunday, February 1, 2004 at 11:40:22 AM you wrote: >> Does anyone know what the priority of message templates is or should >> be? DH> IIRC (and excluding 2.03/50): AB template, then Folder template,

Re: The priority of message templates?

2004-02-01 Thread Dierk Haasis
Hello Ian! On Sunday, February 1, 2004 at 11:40:22 AM you wrote: > Does anyone know what the priority of message templates is or should > be? IIRC (and excluding 2.03/50): AB template, then Folder template, then Account template. -- Dierk Haasis The Bat 2.03 Beta/51 on Windows XP 5.1 2600 S

The priority of message templates?

2004-02-01 Thread Ian A. White
Hi, Does anyone know what the priority of message templates is or should be? I have an account that has a default template. There are two message folders in this account (different software I am on beta lists for) and each of these folders have templates specific to the programs being tested. I a

Re: nice macros for msgid:

2004-02-01 Thread Frank Weidmann
Hello Zygmunt, hello tbbeta, > mid:%SetPattRegexp=";<(.*)>"%RegexpMatch="%Clipboard"%- much better than my "quick and dirty" one, more useable. -- Regards Frank __ The Bat! 2.03 Beta/51 / Windows XP Service Pack

Re: AV Error with Mail Ticker

2004-02-01 Thread Dierk Haasis
Hello Martin! On Sunday, February 1, 2004 at 11:21:04 AM you wrote: > Now in this other software the MailTicker came in front to announce > new mail. When I click to the MailTicker - TheBat comes up with this > AV error message. I usually work in a few open programs the same time, such as Photos

Re: [2.03 Beta/50] Reply templates address book not working anymore

2004-02-01 Thread Dierk Haasis
Hello Krister! On Sunday, February 1, 2004 at 10:41:42 AM you wrote: > Confirmed here. Fixed in beta 51 since yesterday night. -- Dierk Haasis The Bat 2.03 Beta/51 on Windows XP 5.1 2600 Service Pack 1 Cynic: A blackguard whose faulty vision sees things as they are, not as they ought to be

Re: AV Error with Mail Ticker

2004-02-01 Thread Martin Schoch
Hi Dierk On Saturday, January 31, 2004 9:22:05 AM you wrote: >> I clicked on the Mail Ticker to open a message which arrived - but I >> got an AV error message - see attached picture. > Haven't had one with the new beta. As described yesterday - I had it again. Situation: TheBat is in the ba

Re: nice macros for msgid:

2004-02-01 Thread Frank Weidmann
Hello David, hello tbbeta, > I couldn't work out how to get %MSGID to work. I think you're looking for the Macro %OMSGID, that will give you the MID of the original message. The macro: "Message-ID: %OMSGID" produced the line below. Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- Regards Frank _

Re: nice macros for msgid:

2004-02-01 Thread Zygmunt Wereszczynski
On Sunday, February 1, 2004, at 17:28:22 [UTC+0800] (Sunday, February 1, 2004 10:28 my local time) David Pascoe wrote: > I'm sure someone has some nice macros that produce a nice msgid: URL ? I > couldn't work out how to get %MSGID to work. I have to display headers, > copy and paste and edit into

RE:what's that mean? (IMAP question)

2004-02-01 Thread Jurgen Haug
Hello David, Sunday, February 1, 2004, 10:24:27 AM, you wrote: JH>> how is that supposed to work? > "C:\Program Files\The Bat!\thebat.exe" "/IMAPTRACEc:\temp\iiNetIMAP.txt" > as the shortcut to TB! gives me some debug output in the file > c:\temp\iiNetIMAP.txt thanks, that did the trick :-) ca

Re: [2.03 Beta/50] Reply templates address book not working anymore

2004-02-01 Thread Krister Ekstrom
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 Hi David, On 31 Jan 2004 15:58:07 , you typed:: DvZ> For instance I have a special reply template for the tbbeta DvZ> list. But when I reply to a message from this list, TB! uses the DvZ> account default template. DvZ> Can anybody confirm? Confi