Hello TBBETA Members!
Yesterday I installed Achim's bug-fixed BF 2.0.1. Before that I
very, very rarely had a false positive (by 2.0 and predecessors),
all in all I can only remember four instances and they were easily
explainable.
This morning I polled my mail and four out of six
Hello Francis
FG a) The version number still reads 2.0.0?
On mine, the version number is 2.0.1 after automatuc update (The Bat!
must be closed)
I can't use the automatic update function as I'm behind a firewall,
and the plugin upgrade program cannot handle that. I re-downloaded and
re-installed
Hello Dierk,
Thursday, January 6, 2005, 3:17:45 AM, you wrote:
Yesterday I installed Achim's bug-fixed BF 2.0.1. Before that I
very, very rarely had a false positive (by 2.0 and predecessors),
all in all I can only remember four instances and they were easily
explainable.
This
Dierk,
On 06-01-2005 09:17, you [DH] wrote in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
DH Yesterday I installed Achim's bug-fixed BF 2.0.1. Before that I
DH very, very rarely had a false positive (by 2.0 and predecessors),
DH all in all I can only remember four instances and they were easily
DH
Dierk Haasis wrotes on 06/01/2005 at 19:17:45 +1100
subject BayesFilter 201: Much more aggressive? :
This morning I polled my mail and four out of six messages from this
list were suddenly deemed Junk. I didn't change any of my settings.
Anybody seen something similar?
no false
Hello Hendrik!
On Thursday, January 6, 2005 at 1:59:10 PM you wrote:
no false positives here. Please look in the Bayesfilter-logfile if it
was the Bayesian or the Regex method that caused your false positives!
I went through the log with a machete to extract the significant
entries; here are
Dierk,
On 06-01-2005 14:26, you [DH] wrote in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Ursache: gespeicherte DNS-Anfrage
DNSBL.
Ursache: dnsbl.sorbs.net list.dsbl.org
And again.
Ursache: gespeicherte DNS-Anfrage
And again.
So it is due to the fact that DNSBL finally works.
DH Curiously my own message was
Hello Peter!
On Thursday, January 6, 2005 at 2:36:58 PM you wrote:
I does not look like you are on lists (to any greater extent).
Hm, as far as I can interpret the results, I'd say it was pure
coincidence that my own message got filtered/blacklisted. Shouldn't
be; I just notched up the number
Hello George,
On Wed, 5 Jan 2005 19:23:03 -0800 GMT (06/01/2005, 10:23 +0700 GMT),
George Mitchell wrote:
GM As I understand the problem, you have a lot of complicated common
GM filters. Since the common filters are evaluated before account
GM filters, you have to specify continue processing
Hello Thomas,
M No, please. The problem is that Common filters are still buggy. Otherwise
M you could easily do what you wish.
How can I do what I want to do with subfilters in common filters?
George Mitchel has explained it perfectly and, as I can see, you have
seen our point.
--
Best
hello,
please check the logfile which filter catched the false sorted mails. if
it was the dns blacklist filter, try to increase the default value for dns
filtering. if it was the regular expression filter try to increase the
threshold value. alternative you can disable one of them or both!!!
Hello Achim!
On Thursday, January 6, 2005 at 8:02:33 PM you wrote:
please check the logfile which filter catched the false sorted mails. if
it was the dns blacklist filter, try to increase the default value for dns
filtering.
At least the messages I found the lines in the log for showed DNS
Hello Dierk,
Thursday, January 6, 2005, 8:17:45 AM, you wrote:
Hello TBBETA Members!
Yesterday I installed Achim's bug-fixed BF 2.0.1. Before that I
very, very rarely had a false positive (by 2.0 and predecessors),
all in all I can only remember four instances and they were easily
Hello Dierk,
Wednesday, January 5, 2005, 9:59:27 PM, you wrote:
Hello Sean!
On Wednesday, January 5, 2005 at 10:45:08 PM you wrote:
I dunno if you noticed but I cannot seem to get the macros to work :(
Do you mean the Update program? I couldn't make it work correctly at
first - until I
2005-01-06|09:17 you wrote:
This morning I polled my mail and four out of six messages from this
list were suddenly deemed Junk. I didn't change any of my settings.
Anybody seen something similar?
Not here - on contrary: my plug-in seems to be overtained: ver 2.0 and
2.0.1 seems to be more
15 matches
Mail list logo