Re: The Bat! vs Exchange

2005-08-11 Thread Krzysztof Kudlacik
On 05-08-10 (18:15), you wrote: Maybe it is only our Exchange server configuration, This is highy probably I guess - NT administrators make sometime strange things ;[ Best regards, Krzysztof Kudłacik -- pb _, )\__/( ,_ Polska Strona Programu The Bat! | /'.;`-.`{..}',-';.`\

Re: Dispatch All does not dispatch all

2005-08-11 Thread Goncalo Farias
In reply to mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : MS Hello tbbeta, MS Can anyone confirm this: a message marked MS [x] read, [ ] receive, [ ] delete MS in dispatcher does not show up any more when dispatching all MS messages. MS Full story: MS Just had a look into my pop3 mailbox on an exim4 server with

Re: Dispatch All does not dispatch all

2005-08-11 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Martin, On Wed, 10 Aug 2005 23:38:30 +0200 GMT (11/08/2005, 04:38 +0700 GMT), Martin Schuster wrote: Can anyone confirm this: a message marked [x] read, [ ] receive, [ ] delete in dispatcher does not show up any more when dispatching all messages. Not confirmed over here. MS Already

Re: Dispatch All does not dispatch all

2005-08-11 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Thomas! On Thursday, August 11, 2005, 10:21 AM, you wrote: MS Mysterious. My guess is that something goes wrong when the dispatcher is invoked automatically according to the account settings (if that is your setting). I have the dispatcher invoked automatically in my account settings

Re: Dispatch All does not dispatch all

2005-08-11 Thread Martin Schuster
Hello Thomas, MS Already found a workaround: when I activate Account Properties - MS Mail Management - Show all messages on server and check the account MS normally, all messages show up (as they should). Have you set the account to always use the dispatcher? This might be the difference

Re: Dispatch All does not dispatch all

2005-08-11 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Martin! On Thursday, August 11, 2005, 11:10 AM, you wrote: - set Properties...invoke automatically at each mail check on an account you know has new mails - check mail, dispatcher opens. Set only read for some mails - use dispatch all messages: the mail does not show up even though

Re: Dispatch All does not dispatch all

2005-08-11 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Martin! On Thursday, August 11, 2005, 11:10 AM, you wrote: Hey, that was a good guess: this seems to be the problem. Try this (I just checked this here): - set Properties...invoke automatically at each mail check on an account you know has new mails - check mail, dispatcher opens.

PGP/MIME, digest conflict

2005-08-11 Thread Peter Meyns
I still get the infamous signature digest conflict in message error in The Bat! 3.51.10 when I try to verify a PGP/MIME signed message from, let's say, Thunderbird. I think it relates to https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4329 -- Cheers Peter Thunderbird Version 1.0.2 (20050602), Kanotix

Re: Dispatch All does not dispatch all

2005-08-11 Thread Martin Schuster
Hello Peter, Answering a 1 day old message (Wednesday, August 10, 2005, 23:32) Good evening Martin, MS Can anyone confirm this: a message marked MS [x] read, [ ] receive, [ ] delete MS in dispatcher does not show up any more when dispatching all MS messages. Hey, man, I am more than happy

Re: PGP/MIME, digest conflict

2005-08-11 Thread Vladimir 'insider' Prohorov
Good day, Peter. PM I still get the infamous signature digest conflict in message error PM in The Bat! 3.51.10 when I try to verify a PGP/MIME signed message PM from, let's say, Thunderbird. Did you received it with my signed message? Because I did. PM I think it relates to

Re[2]: PGP/MIME, digest conflict

2005-08-11 Thread Vladimir 'insider' Prohorov
binq5pFmLluQw.bin Description: application/pgp-encrypted binLIQb629DzP.bin Description: Binary data Current beta is 3.51.10 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta

Re: PGP/MIME, digest conflict

2005-08-11 Thread Peter Meyns
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 Hi Vladimir, on Thu, 11 Aug 2005 20:58:04 +0400GMT (11.08.2005, 18:58 +0200GMT here), you wrote: ViP This is a PGP encrypted message. ViP Click the security button to decrypt/verify it This is my return: gpg: Signature made 08/11/05

Re: PGP/MIME, digest conflict

2005-08-11 Thread Peter Meyns
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 Hi Vladimir, on Thu, 11 Aug 2005 20:49:15 +0400GMT (11.08.2005, 18:49 +0200GMT here), you wrote: PM I still get the infamous signature digest conflict in message error PM in The Bat! 3.51.10 when I try to verify a PGP/MIME signed message PM

Re: PGP/MIME, digest conflict

2005-08-11 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Vladimir, On Thu, 11 Aug 2005 20:58:04 +0400GMT (11-8-2005, 18:58 +0200, where I live), you wrote: So, apparently something goes wrong when you encrypt a message. I can't see a decrypt button anywhere. While the decrypt function from the menu doesn't do zip either. BTW I can't decipher

Re[3]: PGP/MIME, digest conflict

2005-08-11 Thread Vladimir 'insider' Prohorov
Good day, Vladimir. ViP This is a PGP encrypted message. ViP Click the security button to decrypt/verify it Undecriptable with PGP8.1. And PGP signature check using PGP8.1 always set message to Fail. I receive digest conflict only with GPG. -- WBR, Vladimir 'insider' Prohorov

IMAP: No Message loaded semi-workaround

2005-08-11 Thread Matt Thoene
I have 3 IMAP accounts. Often times when I switch from one to the other, I'll get the infamous No Message Loaded view that can last from one second to a Task Manager Force Shutdown of TB!. I recently noticed that if I'm stuck in the No Message Loaded mode, I can hit the Configure Account icon

Re[2]: PGP/MIME, digest conflict

2005-08-11 Thread Vladimir 'insider' Prohorov
Good day, Peter. PM -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- PM Hash: RIPEMD160 PM Hi Vladimir, PM on Thu, 11 Aug 2005 20:58:04 +0400GMT (11.08.2005, 18:58 +0200GMT here), PM you wrote: ViP This is a PGP encrypted message. ViP Click the security button to decrypt/verify it PM This is my

Re: PGP/MIME, digest conflict

2005-08-11 Thread Peter Meyns
Vladimir 'insider' Prohorov schrieb: PM gpg: Signature made 08/11/05 18:58:04 using RSA key ID 66D309C9 PM gpg: BAD signature from \xc2\xeb\xe0\xe4\xe8\xec\xe8\xf0 PM 'insider' \xcf\xf0\xee\xf5\xee\xf0\xee\xe2 [EMAIL PROTECTED] PM Please, don't send encrypted messages to the list. Nobody

Re[2]: PGP/MIME, digest conflict

2005-08-11 Thread Vladimir 'insider' Prohorov
Good day, Peter. PM hmm this one shows good so far with Enigmail: PM OpenPGP Security Info PM UNTRUSTED Good signature from Vladimir 'insider' Prohorov (Alive and PM kickin') [EMAIL PROTECTED] PM Key ID: 0x66D309C9 / Signed on: 08/11/2005 07:17 PM PM Key fingerprint: F7E9 3CA6 878C 1D3A 8E16

Re: PGP/MIME, digest conflict

2005-08-11 Thread Peter Meyns
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 Hi Vladimir, on Thu, 11 Aug 2005 21:17:32 +0400GMT (11.08.2005, 19:17 +0200GMT here), you wrote: ViP I missed a little... The Bat! returns: gpg: Signature made 08/11/05 19:17:31 using RSA key ID 66D309C9 gpg: WARNING: signature digest

Re: PGP/MIME, digest conflict

2005-08-11 Thread Peter Meyns
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 Hi Vladimir, on Thu, 11 Aug 2005 21:45:04 +0400GMT (11.08.2005, 19:45 +0200GMT here), you wrote: ViP I can say where dog is buried. There is necessary to remove extra ViP CR/LF's before signature part when using GPG. I manually did that

Re[2]: PGP/MIME, digest conflict

2005-08-11 Thread Vladimir 'insider' Prohorov
Good day, Peter. ViP I can say where dog is buried. There is necessary to remove extra ViP CR/LF's before signature part when using GPG. I manually did that and gpg: Signature made 11.08.2005 20:45:06 using DSA key ID E10774CE gpg: Good signature from Peter Meyns PM Why doesn't The Bat!

Re: IMAP: No Message loaded semi-workaround

2005-08-11 Thread -=Curtis=-
On Thursday, August 11, 2005, at 12:19 PM, Matt Thoene wrote: I recently noticed that if I'm stuck in the No Message Loaded mode, I can hit the Configure Account icon and it will somehow kick-start the IMAP session and I will notice the messages magically load behind the configuration screen

Re: IMAP: No Message loaded semi-workaround

2005-08-11 Thread Matt Thoene
On Thursday, August 11, 2005 @ 11:28:04 AM [-0700], -=Curtis=- wrote: I recently noticed that if I'm stuck in the No Message Loaded mode, I can hit the Configure Account icon and it will somehow kick-start the IMAP session and I will notice the messages magically load behind the configuration

Re: IMAP: No Message loaded semi-workaround

2005-08-11 Thread Michael Schneider
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Matt Thoene: It sure does. Sometimes it takes so long that I have to completely restart TB! to get it to load again. In my example above, I can clearly see something happening as soon as my config screen opens. It's like TB! is saying Oh don't go

Re: IMAP: No Message loaded semi-workaround

2005-08-11 Thread -=Curtis=-
On Thursday, August 11, 2005, at 01:32 PM, Matt Thoene wrote: Are you sure that isn't just a coincidence? Definitely not a coincidence. I've tested it thoroughly over the last couple of weeks. Should have mentioned that. Since posting my last message, a few problems have occurred giving

Re: IMAP: No Message loaded semi-workaround

2005-08-11 Thread Matt Thoene
On Thursday, August 11, 2005 @ 12:16:16 PM [-0700], -=Curtis=- wrote: Definitely not a coincidence. I've tested it thoroughly over the last couple of weeks. Should have mentioned that. Since posting my last message, a few problems have occurred giving perfect opportunity for me to test your

Re: IMAP: No Message loaded semi-workaround

2005-08-11 Thread Michael Schneider
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 - -=Curtis=-: What works for me when things are stuck is a server disconnect/reconnect operation. Doesn't work every time here. Sometimes I really have to shut down and restart TheBat! if I want to continue working on the server. Michael - --