Hello Marck D Pearlstone everyone else,
on 21-Mai-2006 at 00:44 you (Marck D Pearlstone) wrote:
The biggest problem with HTML messages is TB's very poor support of
reply to HTML using text.
AIK Yes, thats why I added the PS.
AIK Maybe one :-) should file a bug report for a start.
Dear Alexander,
@21-May-2006, 10:19 +0200 (21-May 09:19 here) Alexander S. Kunz [ASK]
in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck:
AIK Maybe one :-) should file a bug report for a start.
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=5890
ASK Thanks, Marck. Added my note to it.
ASK Any idea why your TB
Thomas,
Most of my colleagues use Eudora Light (freeware), which can
handle HTML mails much better. Can the Rit developers (is Diman in
charge?) kindly take a look at how Eudora handles this very well?
And other things not so. Eudora uses OE components to display html. Native
support for
Hello Gleason,
On Sun, 21 May 2006 10:11:31 -0400 GMT (21/05/2006, 21:11 +0700 GMT),
Gleason Pace wrote:
Most of my colleagues use Eudora Light (freeware), which can
handle HTML mails much better. Can the Rit developers (is Diman in
charge?) kindly take a look at how Eudora handles this very
Thomas,
My colleague you receives the same email in Eudora hits reply, and the
colouring of the comments is maintained. He can now add his own
comments in just another colour, and when he sends his message, the
recipient will see it that way. I cannot do that with TB.
Agreed, probably
In reply to mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
TF Other issues are the additional blank lines and the blue line on the
TF left. These are editor issues which have nothing to do with displaying
TF the incoming HTML message.
TF Is my point clearer now?
a picture is worth a thousand words... put in a
6 matches
Mail list logo
