Re: 3.61.05 new GPG problem

2005-09-25 Thread Henk M. de Bruijn
On Sat, 24 Sep 2005, at 22:54:59 [GMT +0200] (which was 22:54 where I live) Peter Meyns wrote: > Hi Maxim, > on Sat, 24 Sep 2005 18:31:55 +0300GMT, you wrote: MM>> Do there exist any other problem with GnuPG in the latest beta? > Yes there is. I still cannot use it for signing from within The B

Re: 3.61.05 new GPG problem

2005-09-24 Thread Peter Meyns
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 Hi Maxim, on Sat, 24 Sep 2005 18:31:55 +0300GMT, you wrote: MM> Do there exist any other problem with GnuPG in the latest beta? Yes there is. I still cannot use it for signing from within The Bat!. See http://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4171

Re[2]: 3.61.05 new GPG problem

2005-09-24 Thread Maxim Masiutin
> So it's not a problem of TheBat! - GnuPG can't connect to the sever > I had in the configuration - well the "error" message is not very > clear... Do there exist any other problem with GnuPG in the latest beta? -- Current beta is 3.61.

Re: 3.61.05 new GPG problem

2005-09-17 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Dear Henk, @18-Sep-2005, 01:14 +0200 (18-Sep 00:14 here) Henk M. de Bruijn [HDB] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: ... >> gpg: WARNING: signature digest conflict in message >> gpg: Can't check signature: general error ... HDB> See: HDB> https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4329 Mea culpa - ha

Re: 3.61.05 new GPG problem

2005-09-17 Thread Henk M. de Bruijn
On Sat, 17 Sep 2005, at 23:01:39 [GMT +0100] (which was 0:01 where I live) Marck D Pearlstone wrote: > gpg: Signature made 09/17/05 12:41:17 > gpg:using RSA key 0xB464DD0F > gpg: WARNING: signature digest conflict in message > gpg: Can't check signature: general error > Hmmm... H

Re: 3.61.05 new GPG problem

2005-09-17 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Dear Henk, @17-Sep-2005, 13:41 +0200 (17-Sep 12:41 here) Henk M. de Bruijn [HMD] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: >>> What is in your gpg.conf? >> Didn't chance anything after 3.61.05 - but here >> keyserver ldap://horowitz.surfnet.nl:11370 >> keyserver-options auto-key-retrieve >> load-extension

Re: 3.61.05 new GPG problem

2005-09-17 Thread Martin Schoch
Hello Henk, Saturday, September 17, 2005, 1:41:17 PM, you wrote: > I have: > keyserver hkp://pgp.surfnet.nl > And that is working on this side. You are right - so it turnes out that TheBat has problems when GnuPG as to use LDAP protocol... ldap://horowitz.surfnet.nl:11370 -- Best regards,

Re: 3.61.05 new GPG problem

2005-09-17 Thread Henk M. de Bruijn
On Sat, 17 Sep 2005, at 13:23:55 [GMT +0200] (which was 13:23 where I live) Martin Schoch wrote: Hello Martin, >> What is in your gpg.conf? > Didn't chance anything after 3.61.05 - but here > keyserver ldap://horowitz.surfnet.nl:11370 > keyserver-options auto-key-retrieve > load-extension C:\Pr

Re: 3.61.05 new GPG problem

2005-09-17 Thread Martin Schoch
Hello Henk, Saturday, September 17, 2005, 1:13:14 PM, you wrote: >> This worked until 3.61.05 - not with this version. The only text I get >> in the GPG window: >> gpg: Signature made 09/17/05 11:22:32 using DSA key ID XXX >> gpg: requesting key XXX from ldap server horowitz.surfnet.nl

Re: 3.61.05 new GPG problem

2005-09-17 Thread Henk M. de Bruijn
On Sat, 17 Sep 2005, at 12:45:29 [GMT +0200] (which was 12:45 where I live) Martin Schoch wrote: Hi Martin, > Some GPG problems are fixed now with 3.61.05 (thanks!) - but I think I > found a new one. > If the signature isn't in the loacal database gnupg goes online to > search the key on a key s

3.61.05 new GPG problem

2005-09-17 Thread Martin Schoch
Hi list Some GPG problems are fixed now with 3.61.05 (thanks!) - but I think I found a new one. If the signature isn't in the loacal database gnupg goes online to search the key on a key server. This worked until 3.61.05 - not with this version. The only text I get in the GPG window: gpg: Signa