On Tuesday, December 16, 2008, 16:02:09, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
I see. The total concept looks like a very good idea then.
...and now countdown until those e-mail servers start deleting
messages retrieved with TOP :)
--
Jernej Simončič http://eternallybored.org/
[ The Bat! 4.1.11.7 on
Hello Thomas,
Friday, March 13, 2009, 19:18:51, you wrote:
I never understood this one. Reading the RFC, I am no wiser about TOP
versus RETR. Can somebody kindly explain to me what I would need this
for?
TOP returns first N lines of a message, but if N is very large, it will return
the whole
Hello NetVicious,
On Fri, 13 Mar 2009 00:22:41 +0100 GMT (13/Mar/09, 6:22 +0700 GMT),
NetVicious wrote:
TOP gets only Headers and RETR gets all, but you can limit the
Lines
I see. And why again would I need that in TheBat?
as far as i remember my last Telenet to SMTP :-)
I thought
Freitag, 13. März 2009 at 16:36, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
TOP gets only Headers and RETR gets all, but you can limit the
Lines
I see. And why again would I need that in TheBat?
It is more Fast - the first or the second way (i dont know).
And you need it, while you start up the
Hello Jens,
On Fri, 13 Mar 2009 17:40:07 +0100 GMT (13/Mar/09, 23:40 +0700 GMT),
Jens Franik wrote:
TOP gets only Headers and RETR gets all, but you can limit the
Lines
I see. And why again would I need that in TheBat?
JF It is more Fast - the first or the second way (i dont know).
Freitag, 13. März 2009 at 18:01, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
Do you use Voyager when you're outside? If so, do you mean you use the
Dispatcher?
Yes, thats true, both.
--
With kind Regards
Jens Franik
mailto:je...@gmx.de
Picture of me? X-Rogue http://www.de2all.de/Kr_bat.jpg
The Bat! 4.1.11.6
Hello Maxim,
On Tue, 16 Dec 2008 12:57:59 +0200 GMT (16/Dec/08, 17:57 +0700 GMT),
Maxim Masiutin wrote:
MM The Bat! 4.1.1.5 RC1 (BETA) is available at
MM http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/beta/tb4115.rar
[...]
MM [+] /POP3FORCETOP command line option to use TOP command instead of
Donnerstag, 12. März 2009 at 18:18, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
I never understood this one. Reading the RFC, I am no wiser about TOP
versus RETR. Can somebody kindly explain to me what I would need this
for?
TOP gets only Headers and RETR gets all, but you can limit the
Lines as far as
jueves, 12 mar 2009 at 21:19, it seems you wrote:
TOP gets only Headers and RETR gets all, but you can limit the
Lines as far as i remember my last Telenet to SMTP :-)
Your memory it's ok, dot enter enter ;-)
--
/\/ Using The Bat! 4.1.11.6 Professional
/ \
Hello Thomas,
Tuesday, December 16, 2008, 15:20:04, you wrote:
Just asking: What is this good for?
There are some servers (not quite usual) that remove a message that have been
retrieved by RETR, so if you will get it from one computer , you will be unable
to also get it on another. This
Hello Thomas,
Tuesday, December 16, 2008, 16:08:17, you wrote:
If I did, I would have to add the required n parameter too,
wouldn't I?
No, The Bat! does this automatically to retreive a full message.
--
Best regards,
Maxim Masiutinmailto:m...@ritlabs.com
Hello Maxim,
On Tue, 16 Dec 2008 15:47:19 +0200 GMT (16/12/2008, 20:47 +0700 GMT),
Maxim Masiutin wrote:
Just asking: What is this good for?
MM There are some servers (not quite usual) that remove a message
MM that have been retrieved by RETR, so if you will get it from one
MM computer , you
Hello Maxim,
On Tue, 16 Dec 2008 16:51:35 +0200 GMT (16/12/2008, 21:51 +0700 GMT),
Maxim Masiutin wrote:
If I did, I would have to add the required n parameter too,
wouldn't I?
MM No, The Bat! does this automatically to retreive a full message.
I see. The total concept looks like a very good
Hello Maxim,
On Tue, 16 Dec 2008 12:57:59 +0200 GMT (16/12/2008, 17:57 +0700 GMT),
Maxim Masiutin wrote:
MM [+] /POP3FORCETOP command line option to use TOP command instead of
RETR on POP3
Just asking: What is this good for?
From RFC1725 we learn:
RETR msg
Arguments:
a
14 matches
Mail list logo