Re: 4.1.1.5 TOP vs RETR

2009-03-18 Thread Jernej Simončič
On Tuesday, December 16, 2008, 16:02:09, Thomas Fernandez wrote: I see. The total concept looks like a very good idea then. ...and now countdown until those e-mail servers start deleting messages retrieved with TOP :) -- Jernej Simončič http://eternallybored.org/ [ The Bat! 4.1.11.7 on

Re[2]: 4.1.1.5 TOP vs RETR

2009-03-17 Thread Maxim Masiutin
Hello Thomas, Friday, March 13, 2009, 19:18:51, you wrote: I never understood this one. Reading the RFC, I am no wiser about TOP versus RETR. Can somebody kindly explain to me what I would need this for? TOP returns first N lines of a message, but if N is very large, it will return the whole

Re: 4.1.1.5 TOP vs RETR

2009-03-13 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello NetVicious, On Fri, 13 Mar 2009 00:22:41 +0100 GMT (13/Mar/09, 6:22 +0700 GMT), NetVicious wrote: TOP gets only Headers and RETR gets all, but you can limit the Lines I see. And why again would I need that in TheBat? as far as i remember my last Telenet to SMTP :-) I thought

Re: 4.1.1.5 TOP vs RETR

2009-03-13 Thread Jens Franik
Freitag, 13. März 2009 at 16:36, Thomas Fernandez wrote: TOP gets only Headers and RETR gets all, but you can limit the Lines I see. And why again would I need that in TheBat? It is more Fast - the first or the second way (i dont know). And you need it, while you start up the

Re: 4.1.1.5 TOP vs RETR

2009-03-13 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Jens, On Fri, 13 Mar 2009 17:40:07 +0100 GMT (13/Mar/09, 23:40 +0700 GMT), Jens Franik wrote: TOP gets only Headers and RETR gets all, but you can limit the Lines I see. And why again would I need that in TheBat? JF It is more Fast - the first or the second way (i dont know).

Re: 4.1.1.5 TOP vs RETR

2009-03-13 Thread Jens Franik
Freitag, 13. März 2009 at 18:01, Thomas Fernandez wrote: Do you use Voyager when you're outside? If so, do you mean you use the Dispatcher? Yes, thats true, both. -- With kind Regards Jens Franik mailto:je...@gmx.de Picture of me? X-Rogue http://www.de2all.de/Kr_bat.jpg The Bat! 4.1.11.6

Re: 4.1.1.5 TOP vs RETR

2009-03-12 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Maxim, On Tue, 16 Dec 2008 12:57:59 +0200 GMT (16/Dec/08, 17:57 +0700 GMT), Maxim Masiutin wrote: MM The Bat! 4.1.1.5 RC1 (BETA) is available at MM http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/beta/tb4115.rar [...] MM [+] /POP3FORCETOP command line option to use TOP command instead of

Re: 4.1.1.5 TOP vs RETR

2009-03-12 Thread Jens Franik
Donnerstag, 12. März 2009 at 18:18, Thomas Fernandez wrote: I never understood this one. Reading the RFC, I am no wiser about TOP versus RETR. Can somebody kindly explain to me what I would need this for? TOP gets only Headers and RETR gets all, but you can limit the Lines as far as

Re: 4.1.1.5 TOP vs RETR

2009-03-12 Thread NetVicious
jueves, 12 mar 2009 at 21:19, it seems you wrote: TOP gets only Headers and RETR gets all, but you can limit the Lines as far as i remember my last Telenet to SMTP :-) Your memory it's ok, dot enter enter ;-) -- /\/ Using The Bat! 4.1.11.6 Professional / \

Re[2]: 4.1.1.5 TOP vs RETR

2008-12-16 Thread Maxim Masiutin
Hello Thomas, Tuesday, December 16, 2008, 15:20:04, you wrote: Just asking: What is this good for? There are some servers (not quite usual) that remove a message that have been retrieved by RETR, so if you will get it from one computer , you will be unable to also get it on another. This

Re[2]: 4.1.1.5 TOP vs RETR

2008-12-16 Thread Maxim Masiutin
Hello Thomas, Tuesday, December 16, 2008, 16:08:17, you wrote: If I did, I would have to add the required n parameter too, wouldn't I? No, The Bat! does this automatically to retreive a full message. -- Best regards, Maxim Masiutinmailto:m...@ritlabs.com

Re: 4.1.1.5 TOP vs RETR

2008-12-16 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Maxim, On Tue, 16 Dec 2008 15:47:19 +0200 GMT (16/12/2008, 20:47 +0700 GMT), Maxim Masiutin wrote: Just asking: What is this good for? MM There are some servers (not quite usual) that remove a message MM that have been retrieved by RETR, so if you will get it from one MM computer , you

Re: 4.1.1.5 TOP vs RETR

2008-12-16 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Maxim, On Tue, 16 Dec 2008 16:51:35 +0200 GMT (16/12/2008, 21:51 +0700 GMT), Maxim Masiutin wrote: If I did, I would have to add the required n parameter too, wouldn't I? MM No, The Bat! does this automatically to retreive a full message. I see. The total concept looks like a very good

Re: 4.1.1.5 TOP vs RETR

2008-12-16 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Maxim, On Tue, 16 Dec 2008 12:57:59 +0200 GMT (16/12/2008, 17:57 +0700 GMT), Maxim Masiutin wrote: MM [+] /POP3FORCETOP command line option to use TOP command instead of RETR on POP3 Just asking: What is this good for? From RFC1725 we learn: RETR msg Arguments: a