Re: BUG: no TO field after signing S/MIME + 8 bit

2000-07-20 Thread Marck D. Pearlstone
Hi Thomas, On 20 July 2000 at 12:02:01 GMT +0800 (which was 05:02 where I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points on the subject of "BUG: no "TO" field after signing S/MIME + 8 bit": S I cannot send S/MIME signed email when high ascii is present in the S TO: fie

Re: BUG: no TO field after signing S/MIME + 8 bit

2000-07-20 Thread Ming-Li
Hi Thomas, S I cannot send S/MIME signed email when high ascii is present in S the TO: field. After finishing the message, it just sits in the S Outbox with no "TO:". Allow a non-beta question: aren't email addresses supposed to not contain any high-ASCII characters? I think SyP is talking

Re: BUG: no TO field after signing S/MIME + 8 bit

2000-07-20 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Marck, On Thu, 20 Jul 2000 09:47:42 +0100GMT (20/07/2000, 16:47 +0800GMT), Marck D. Pearlstone wrote: MDP It is optional: Account settings -- options -- "Allow 8 bit characters MDP in headers" option. I was referring to RFC's. I have never seen an email address with German umlauts or

Re: BUG: no TO field after signing S/MIME + 8 bit

2000-07-20 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Ming-Li, On Thu, 20 Jul 2000 02:00:31 -0700GMT (20/07/2000, 17:00 +0800GMT), Ming-Li wrote: ML I think SyP is talking about the "real name" part of the "TO:" ML field. Ah, now I see. Thanks. -- Cheers, Thomas. Message reply created with The Bat! 1.44 under Chinese Windows 98 4.10