Re: Signature delimiter (was: Re: Backup script was: (The Bat! v2.01.49 is now available))

2003-12-05 Thread Tony Boom
On Mon, 1 Dec 2003 19:20:10 +0100, Marcus Ohlström wrote : Ah, you are emailing from PocoMail. Don't know about PocoMail so I'll trust you. Exactly. I've been using TB! for quite a few years and have been on this and all the other TB lists for the same period. Do you honestly believe I don't

Re: Signature delimiter (was: Re: Backup script was: (The Bat! v2.01.49 is now available))

2003-12-05 Thread Markus Gloede
Hi, Tony Boom wrote in msgid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Believe me I have tried... BLOODY HARD! And what makes it worse is I can see the delimiter is there, space an all just by running the cursor over it. But I bet the trailing space is gone when this gets to the list. You won your bet. (SCNR) The

Re: Backup script was: (The Bat! v2.01.49 is now available)

2003-12-02 Thread laurier
reactie op e-mail van maandag 1 december 2003 over Backup script was: (The Bat! v2.01.49 is now available) Hallo Leif, Please include a signature delimiter in your messages. This consists of a dashdashspacereturn, i.e., a '-- ' by itself on a line. This allows your readers, when replying

Re: Backup script was: (The Bat! v2.01.49 is now available)

2003-12-01 Thread Paul Wilson
Monday, 12/1/2003, 3:48 PM Hi Mark, On Mon, 1 Dec 2003, at 22:51:40 [GMT +0100] (which was 1:51 PM where I live) you wrote about: 'Backup script was: (The Bat! v2.01.49 is now available)' MP Testing is the only reason for this message. Just wanted to try this out MP myself. So, IF it should

Re: Backup script was: (The Bat! v2.01.49 is now available)

2003-11-29 Thread Tony Boom
On Sat, 29 Nov 2003 11:49:28 +0100, Marcus Ohlström wrote: I haven't used it myself, but it should work. Unless the registry points for TB! are moved under XP, but that's easy to find out. If it's Januks batch file that backs up TB registry entries then yes, it works exceptional well under XP.

Re[2]: Backup script was: (The Bat! v2.01.49 is now available)

2003-11-29 Thread NetVicious
sábado, 29 nov 2003 at 14:24, it seems you wrote: The only problem is you can restore it from 98 up to XP/2000 but not from XP/2000 back to 98. So don't get caught out like I did once. Have you tried changing the first line of a .reg file from Windows Registry Editor Version 5.00 to

Re[3]: Backup script was: (The Bat! v2.01.49 is now available)

2003-11-29 Thread Dimitry Andric
On 2003-11-29 at 18:34:56 NetVicious wrote: Have you tried changing the first line of a .reg file from Windows Registry Editor Version 5.00 to REGEDIT4 This will not help, since these new format registry files are also in Unicode format, which Windows 9x doesn't support (at least, only in very