Re: Old flicker problem back (was: Header problem, v3.60.05)

2005-10-22 Thread Vili
Hello Thomas, It's a fraction of a second, I always only saw flickering (since 3.60.02). Now that you say the picture appears twice for a little moment and if I really concentrate, I confirm this is the case here too, and that is what my eyes perceive as flickering. V Anyone confirms?

Old flicker problem back (was: Header problem, v3.60.05)

2005-10-21 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Vili, On Sun, 28 Aug 2005 17:16:51 +0200 GMT (28/08/2005, 22:16 +0700 GMT), Vili wrote: It's a fraction of a second, I always only saw flickering (since 3.60.02). Now that you say the picture appears twice for a little moment and if I really concentrate, I confirm this is the case here

Re: Header problem, v3.60.05

2005-08-29 Thread Alexander S. Kunz
Hello Vili everyone else, on 28-Aug-2005 at 20:43 you (Vili) wrote: Sorry, not on mine... I have Celeron 1100T + 256MB RAM with Windows Server 2003 on it. And I have to wait a coule of seconds everytime when I open folder with 800+ threaded messages. I have to wait about half a minute

Re[2]: Header problem, v3.60.05

2005-08-28 Thread Vili
Hello Peter, V I have the Display sender and the Fit headers to image clicked (it V should be, I guess, more likely Fit image to headers, not?) No. If you check Fit headers to image, TB displays the image in its original size and adjusts (fits) the header pane to it. If you uncheck this

Re[2]: Header problem, v3.60.05

2005-08-28 Thread Vili
Hello Thomas, V So, my TB! is very slow after it runs for a while, so maybe I see V stuff you dont really can observe. (However, I restarted it, and I can V still observe.) After installing v.3.60.05, if I open a mail with the V photo shown in the header, there are two pictures shown for a

Re[2]: Header problem, v3.60.05

2005-08-28 Thread Vili
Hello Greg, It is there only for a fraction of a second. Yes, you have to be looking for it. Maybe this can only be verified on a slower machine? I guess 2.4 Mhz with 500 MB of ram is slow by today's standards. But not for an email client... TB! should FLY even on a 1 GHz Celeron... --

Re: Header problem, v3.60.05

2005-08-28 Thread Alexander S. Kunz
Hello Greg Strong everyone else, on 28-Aug-2005 at 01:14 you (Greg Strong) wrote: 2.4 Mhz with 500 MB of ram is slow by today's standards Mhz? Definitely! My first Amiga had 7.16MHz back in 1986. ;-) -- Best regards, Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de - ICQ 238153981) Knowledge may give

Re[3]: Header problem, v3.60.05

2005-08-28 Thread Vladimir 'insider' Prohorov
Good day, Vili. It is there only for a fraction of a second. Yes, you have to be looking for it. Maybe this can only be verified on a slower machine? I guess 2.4 Mhz with 500 MB of ram is slow by today's standards. V But not for an email client... TB! should FLY even on a 1 GHz V Celeron...

Re: Header problem, v3.60.05

2005-08-28 Thread Alexander S. Kunz
Hello Vladimir 'insider' Prohorov everyone else, on 28-Aug-2005 at 18:47 you (Vladimir 'insider' Prohorov) wrote: Sorry, not on mine... I have Celeron 1100T + 256MB RAM with Windows Server 2003 on it. And I have to wait a coule of seconds everytime when I open folder with 800+ threaded

Re[4]: Header problem, v3.60.05

2005-08-28 Thread Vili
Hello Vladimir, It is there only for a fraction of a second. Yes, you have to be looking for it. Maybe this can only be verified on a slower machine? I guess 2.4 Mhz with 500 MB of ram is slow by today's standards. V But not for an email client... TB! should FLY even on a 1 GHz V Celeron...

Header problem, v3.60.05

2005-08-27 Thread Vili
Hello tbbeta, So, my TB! is very slow after it runs for a while, so maybe I see stuff you dont really can observe. (However, I restarted it, and I can still observe.) After installing v.3.60.05, if I open a mail with the photo shown in the header, there are two pictures shown for a while (a

Re: Header problem, v3.60.05

2005-08-27 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Vili, On Sun, 28 Aug 2005 00:00:07 +0200 GMT (28/08/2005, 05:00 +0700 GMT), Vili wrote: V So, my TB! is very slow after it runs for a while, so maybe I see V stuff you dont really can observe. (However, I restarted it, and I can V still observe.) After installing v.3.60.05, if I open