Hi Jonathan Angliss
-
On Sun, 31 Jul 2005, at 22:42:05 [GMT -0500] (which was 8:42 PM where
I live) you wrote:
So what am I seeing. I'm seeing bad handling of multiple connections.
It appears that, despite having dedicated 4 connections to TB, it
On Wednesday, August 03, 2005 at 3:22:29 PM [GMT -0500], Kevin Amazon
wrote:
I have the exact same problem here. I'm looking at the connection
center as I write this and there are 6 hung processes (using IMAP
BTW). I have TB configured to 10 connections and only 2 are being
used.
yeah. Only
Hi -=Curtis=-
-
On Wed, 3 Aug 2005, at 16:24:17 [GMT -0500] (which was 2:24 PM where I
live) you wrote:
On Wednesday, August 03, 2005 at 3:22:29 PM [GMT -0500], Kevin Amazon
wrote:
yeah. Only 2 are ever being used. The interesting thing is that
On Wednesday, August 03, 2005 at 4:28:06 PM [GMT -0500], Kevin Amazon
wrote:
Exactly. I have now 3 tasks that are obviously hung (having been
executing for over 3 hours). It is pretty obvious to me that IMAP is
still not quite ready for prime time. sigh
I can now actually say that the problem
On 8/4/05, Kevin Amazon wrote:
Exactly. I have now 3 tasks that are obviously hung (having been
executing for over 3 hours). It is pretty obvious to me that IMAP is
still not quite ready for prime time. sigh
Pardon me for jumping into this thread without studying the entire
discussion, but is
Hello Jay,
Wednesday, August 3, 2005, 5:49:12 PM, you wrote:
As I experience 3.51.10, it is heavy and slow - as opposed to other
more friendly versions that were light and fast. With 3.51.10, I am
I'm finding exactly the same slow performance on a series of POP3
Accounts.
--
Best regards,
On Wednesday, August 3, 2005, 4:28:06 PM, Kevin Amazon wrote:
Exactly. I have now 3 tasks that are obviously hung (having been
executing for over 3 hours). It is pretty obvious to me that IMAP
is still not quite ready for prime time. sigh
A few weeks ago, when I was doing POP, not IMAP, I
8/3/2005 7:45 PM
Hi Richard,
On 8/3/2005 Richard Newman wrote:
RN Hello Jay,
RN Wednesday, August 3, 2005, 5:49:12 PM, you wrote:
As I experience 3.51.10, it is heavy and slow - as opposed to other
more friendly versions that were light and fast. With 3.51.10, I am
RN I'm finding exactly
TBBETA,
On 8/3/2005, 05:41 PM, you scribbled:
DAC On Wednesday, August 3, 2005, 4:28:06 PM, Kevin Amazon wrote:
Exactly. I have now 3 tasks that are obviously hung (having been
executing for over 3 hours). It is pretty obvious to me that IMAP
is still not quite ready for prime time. sigh
Jonathan,
I agree with everything you've said. I've often thought about putting
more focus on this issue myself.
--
greeting Best regards /greeting
author Peter Fjelsten /author
thebat version 3.51.10 Pro /thebat version
env. ~12 POP3, 4 IMAP (MailMax 5.5) 1 IMAP (Exchange 6.5), 175K
Hello Jonathan,
JA You need a single queue manager/thread. That queue manager polls on a
JA regular basis for items that are added to its queue. If it finds an
JA item in its queue, it then checks the active connections and searches
JA through them until it finds an idle connection, at which
9Val,
On 01-08-2005 13:54, you [9] wrote in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
9 So... There are 2 problems:
9 1. Why message list request hanged?
9 2. Why TB! thinks that \Admin folder is not selectable from other
9 connection - it could be caused with another broken request which had
9 selected the
Hello 9Val,
Monday (August 1, 2005, 4:54 AM) you wrote:
Could you give any hints when it happens? If it happens in the
same conditions?
I am glad you are working on this. I would imagine this problem is
related to the following, all of which only happen occasionally:
1. Compress and
Hello John,
JT May I ask that all programmers of TB! work exclusively (except for
JT specific tests) on IMAP for six months with a requirement of changing
JT IMAP servers every month? This would give you a good users
JT perspective, which would substantially help the program, in my view.
JT
Hi 9Val,
On Monday, August 01, 2005, you wrote:
JA You need a single queue manager/thread. That queue manager polls
JA on a regular basis for items that are added to its queue. If it
JA finds an item in its queue, it then checks the active connections
JA and searches through them until it finds
On Monday, August 01, 2005 at 8:15:49 AM [GMT -0500], John Thomas wrote:
I am glad you are working on this. I would imagine this problem is
related to the following, all of which only happen occasionally:
1. Compress and reindex of IMAP shows damaged mailboxes.
2. Folder pain shows
JT May I ask that all programmers of TB! work exclusively (except for
JT specific tests) on IMAP for six months with a requirement of changing
JT IMAP servers every month? This would give you a good users
JT perspective, which would substantially help the program, in my view.
JT Further, your
Hey All,
I posted a response to one of Allie's imap threads a while back, but
due to the fact I've not been active much, I've not had much of a
chance to follow up on it too well. So I thought I'd try a new
thread, see what we get, and post reports based on the feedback.
I use TB with multiple
18 matches
Mail list logo
