Re: PGP 9 and TheBat

2006-05-01 Thread Vilius Šumskas
Hello Charlene, Sunday, April 30, 2006, 11:33:24 PM, you wrote: Hi Vilius Šumskas, Sunday, April 30, 2006 you let us know -possibly edited- : The Bat! don't have source open. So we must not trust them then right? TB isn't a privacy enhancement company ;) Ok, we should not trust TB's

PGP 9 and TheBat

2006-04-30 Thread Per Michael Knudsen
Hello tbbeta, When will TheBat be modified so that integrates well with PGP 9 (able to use buttons to decryp/encrypt etc.) -- Best regards, Per mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Samspilssituationer, involverende spæde

Re: PGP 9 and TheBat

2006-04-30 Thread Peter Meyns
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 Hi Per, on Sun, 30 Apr 2006 09:02:17 +0200GMT (30.04.2006, 09:02 +0200GMT here), you wrote: PMK When will TheBat be modified so that integrates well with PGP 9 PMK (able to use buttons to decryp/encrypt etc.) As far as I understand, PGP 9

Re: PGP 9 and TheBat

2006-04-30 Thread Vilius Šumskas
Hello Peter, Sunday, April 30, 2006, 8:18:14 PM, you wrote: As far as I understand, PGP 9 is proprietary code of pgp.com, so it depends on them to provide means of access to other software developers. (Someone correct me if I'm wrong.) They have a public open SDK. -- Best regards, Vilius

Re: PGP 9 and TheBat

2006-04-30 Thread Jernej Simončič
On Sunday, April 30, 2006, 21:40:23, Vilius Šumskas wrote: As far as I understand, PGP 9 is proprietary code of pgp.com, so it depends on them to provide means of access to other software developers. (Someone correct me if I'm wrong.) They have a public open SDK. Doesn't matter - never trust

Re: PGP 9 and TheBat

2006-04-30 Thread Vilius Šumskas
Hello Jernej, Sunday, April 30, 2006, 10:57:05 PM, you wrote: On Sunday, April 30, 2006, 21:40:23, Vilius Šumskas wrote: As far as I understand, PGP 9 is proprietary code of pgp.com, so it depends on them to provide means of access to other software developers. (Someone correct me if I'm

Re: PGP 9 and TheBat

2006-04-30 Thread Charlene Ferrara
Hi Vilius Šumskas, Sunday, April 30, 2006 you let us know -possibly edited- : The Bat! don't have source open. So we must not trust them then right? TB isn't a privacy enhancement company ;) -- kind regards Charlene Ferrara mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v3.80.03 on Windows XP 5.1

Re: PGP 9 and TheBat

2006-04-30 Thread Sebastian Murawski
Hello TheBat Beta List Members!!! Someday, and that was in Sunday evening, Peter wrote something like this: I suggest to use previous PGP versions, or, even better, GnuPG from www.gnupg.org. GnuPG not support eToken and iKey. :( BTW is in TB implemented support for Certificate

Re: PGP 9 and TheBat

2006-04-30 Thread Google Mail
Hello Jernej, Sunday, April 30, 2006, 12:57:05 PM, you wrote: Doesn't matter - never trust a privacy enhancement program that doesn't have it's source open. PGP 9.x has always had it's source code open for others to scrutinize. With respect to PGP TB, I too would like RitLabs to work

PGP 9 Desktop

2005-11-26 Thread bw22z
When TB will support it? Current beta is 3.63.05 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

Re: PGP 9

2005-05-31 Thread Tony Boom
Hello Avi, A reminder of what Avi Yashar on TBBETA typed on: 27 May 2005 at 17:33:00 GMT +0200 Well, nothing works for me - not from within TB. I cannot tell TB which version of PGP I have. The options are for 5, 6, 7, and 8. And when I check that anyway, then TB cannot find my PGP

Re: PGP 9

2005-05-31 Thread Tony Boom
Hello Allie, A reminder of what Allie Martin on TBBETA typed on: 29 May 2005 at 13:30:33 GMT +0200 PGP9 uses an xml file to store it's configuration data. PGP8 used a text file. So I created a text file and put the following lines: Ah, thought someone may have answered but it was a few

Re: PGP 9

2005-05-31 Thread Avi Yashar
On 5/31/05, Tony Boom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: PGP9 uses an xml file to store it's configuration data. PGP8 used a text file. So I created a text file and put the following lines: Ah, thought someone may have answered but it was a few 100 posts later than the one I read. Thanks

Re: PGP 9

2005-05-31 Thread Tony Boom
Hello Avi, A reminder of what Avi Yashar on TBBETA typed on: 31 May 2005 at 18:45:47 GMT +0200 Thanks anyway, Tony. Your welcome, glad it's working. -- Tony. Using The Bat! v3.5.23 Windows XP Home SP2 Pentium IV, 2.4Ghz Home Built Desktop. :gentoo: www.gentoo.org

Re: PGP 9

2005-05-31 Thread Avi Yashar
On 5/31/05, Tony Boom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Your welcome, glad it's working. Working - yes - but still just a partial integration. :-) -- Avi Yashar Windows XP Pro SP2 and The Bat! Pro 3.5.24 Current beta is 3.5.24 | 'Using

Re: PGP 9

2005-05-29 Thread Allie Martin
On Friday, May 27, 2005 at 10:32:21 AM [GMT -0500], Avi Yashar wrote: Well, nothing works for me - not from within TB. I cannot tell TB which version of PGP I have. The options are for 5, 6, 7, and 8. And when I check that anyway, then TB cannot find my PGP preferences or key manager. So,

Re: PGP 9

2005-05-29 Thread Avi Yashar
On 5/29/05, Allie Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just discovered some more stuff with this: I got it to work. Allie, you are a genius. PGP9 uses an xml file to store it's configuration data. PGP8 used a text file. So I created a text file and put the following lines: I guess that's why

Re: PGP 9

2005-05-29 Thread Allie Martin
On Sunday, May 29, 2005 at 7:10:04 AM [GMT -0500], Avi Yashar wrote: Okay. But it would have been a bit more elegant if the menu item in TB could actually invoke the Key Manager as indicated. :-) They need to fix the integrated support to not only read the xml file for paths to the keyrings,

PGP 9

2005-05-27 Thread Avi Yashar
TB's integration with PGP9 is only partial. Any chance to fix this in the near future? -- Avi Yashar Windows XP Pro SP2 and The Bat! Pro 3.5.18 Current beta is 3.5.0.18 | 'Using TBBETA' information:

Re: PGP 9

2005-05-27 Thread Tony Boom
Hello Avi. --On 27 May 2005 16:51 +0300 you wrote about PGP 9: TB's integration with PGP9 is only partial. Any chance to fix this in the near future? I have no trouble with TB and PGP9, it works very well, infinitely better than with Mulberry. -- Tony. M. pgpGNfSrG5RON.pgp Description

Re: PGP 9

2005-05-27 Thread Avi Yashar
On 5/27/05, Tony Boom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: TB's integration with PGP9 is only partial. Any chance to fix this in the near future? I have no trouble with TB and PGP9, it works very well, infinitely better than with Mulberry. Well, nothing works for me - not from within TB. I cannot