Re: GnuPG support still unsufficient

2005-05-14 Thread Henk M. de Bruijn
On Sat, 14 May 2005, at 07:32:18 [GMT +0200] (which was 7:32 where I live) Peter Meyns wrote: Hi Peter, HMdB Strange, you know I have a freeform UID and this message is signed HMdB pgp/mime. gpg: Signature made 05/13/05 22:36:22 using DSA key ID 8C32408B gpg: WARNING: signature digest

Re: GnuPG support still unsufficient

2005-05-14 Thread Kevin Coates
Hi Martin, On Sat, 14 May 2005 09:12:27 +0200 (3:12 AM here), Martin Schoch [MS] wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: gpg: Signature made 05/13/05 22:36:22 using DSA key ID 8C32408B gpg: WARNING: signature digest conflict in message gpg: Can't check signature: general error MS Have the same

Re: GnuPG support still unsufficient

2005-05-14 Thread Peter Meyns
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Martin, on Sat, 14 May 2005 09:12:27 +0200GMT, you wrote: HMdB How does the signing go with RC9? HMdB ...snip Again the same error. No way to use PGP/MIME with this address. I can only sign using GPGshell. HMdB Strange, you know I have a

Re: GnuPG support still unsufficient

2005-05-14 Thread Henk M. de Bruijn
On Sat, 14 May 2005, at 17:31:40 [GMT +0200] (which was 17:31 where I live) Peter Meyns wrote: ...snip gpg: Signature made 05/13/05 22:36:22 using DSA key ID 8C32408B gpg: WARNING: signature digest conflict in message gpg: Can't check signature: general error MS Have the same message from

Re: GnuPG support still unsufficient

2005-05-14 Thread Henk M. de Bruijn
On Sat, 14 May 2005, at 10:55:04 [GMT -0400] (which was 16:55 where I live) Kevin Coates wrote: Hi Kevin, ...snip gpg: Signature made 05/13/05 22:36:22 using DSA key ID 8C32408B gpg: WARNING: signature digest conflict in message gpg: Can't check signature: general error MS Have the same

Re: GnuPG support still unsufficient

2005-05-13 Thread Henk M. de Bruijn
On Thu, 12 May 2005, at 18:06:18 [GMT +0200] (which was 18:06 where I live) Peter Meyns wrote: ...snip I also tried OpenPGP. No difference. Same error, no matter what I select. Hi Peter, How does the signing go with RC9? I did some tests with different UID's and I as far as I can see now, I

Re: GnuPG support still unsufficient

2005-05-13 Thread Henk M. de Bruijn
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 On Fri, 13 May 2005, at 08:45:57 [GMT +0200] (which was 8:45 where I live) Henk de Bruijn wrote: On Thu, 12 May 2005, at 18:06:18 [GMT +0200] (which was 18:06 where I live) Peter Meyns wrote: ...snip I also tried OpenPGP. No difference.

Re: GnuPG support still unsufficient

2005-05-13 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Peter, On Fri, 13 May 2005 17:42:34 +0200GMT (13-5-2005, 17:42 +0200, where I live), you wrote: PM Again the same error. No way to use PGP/MIME with this address. Works fine for me -- Groetjes, Roelof The characters in this message are recyclable The Bat! 3.5 Return RC9 Windows XP 5.1

Re: GnuPG support still unsufficient

2005-05-13 Thread Peter Meyns
Hi Roelof, on Fri, 13 May 2005 18:55:07 +0200GMT, you wrote: PM Again the same error. No way to use PGP/MIME with this address. RO Works fine for me I see it and I believe it. But still I don't understand why it doesn't work here. Not even on this rather freshly set up notebook... hmm --

Re: GnuPG support still unsufficient

2005-05-13 Thread Henk M. de Bruijn
On Fri, 13 May 2005, at 17:42:34 [GMT +0200] (which was 17:42 where I live) Peter Meyns wrote: Hi Peter, HMdB How does the signing go with RC9? ...snip Again the same error. No way to use PGP/MIME with this address. I can only sign using GPGshell. Strange, you know I have a freeform UID and

Re: GnuPG support still unsufficient

2005-05-13 Thread Peter Meyns
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Henk, on Fri, 13 May 2005 22:36:22 +0200GMT, you wrote: HMdB How does the signing go with RC9? HMdB ...snip Again the same error. No way to use PGP/MIME with this address. I can only sign using GPGshell. HMdB Strange, you know I have a

Re: GnuPG support still unsufficient

2005-05-12 Thread Kevin Coates
Hi Peter, On Thu, 12 May 2005 07:53:27 +0200 (1:53 AM here), Peter Meyns [PM] wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: PM It is set to none here. Still, this is the answer, when I try to PM sign from within TB!: PM gpg: key 9E19BFC2: secret key without public key - skipped gpg: no PM default secret key:

Re: GnuPG support still unsufficient

2005-05-12 Thread Peter Meyns
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Kevin, on Thu, 12 May 2005 02:30:49 -0400GMT, you wrote: PM It is set to none here. Still, this is the answer, when I try to PM sign from within TB!: KC Try setting it for pgp8. I also tried OpenPGP. No difference. Same error, no matter what I

Re: GnuPG support still unsufficient

2005-05-11 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Dear Peter, @11-May-2005, 22:05 +0200 (11-May 21:05 UK time) Peter Meyns [PM] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Peter: PM ... The problem is, that The Bat! doesn't recognize other UIDs PM than the first. ... It is probably related to BT entry PM http://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4171 PM This

Re: GnuPG support still unsufficient

2005-05-11 Thread Henk M. de Bruijn
On Wed, 11 May 2005, at 22:45:42 [GMT +0100] (which was 23:45 where I live) Marck D Pearlstone wrote: PM ... The problem is, that The Bat! doesn't recognize other UIDs PM than the first. ... It is probably related to BT entry PM http://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4171 PM This old bug still

Re: GnuPG support still unsufficient

2005-05-11 Thread Peter Meyns
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 Hi Marck, on Wed, 11 May 2005 22:45:42 +0100GMT, you wrote: PM ... The problem is, that The Bat! doesn't recognize other UIDs PM than the first. ... It is probably related to BT entry PM http://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4171 PM This old