Re: Sig-delimiter not properly recognized

2008-01-05 Thread Uwe Steinfeld
Hello Peter, On 2008-01-05 you wrote: Hi all, when there is more than one sig-delimiter in a message, TB! doesn't recognize the first, but the last one. Confirmed under 4.0.0.7 -- Regards, Uwe Using The Bat! v4.0.0.7 (ALPHA) on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2

Re: Sig-delimiter not properly recognized

2008-01-05 Thread Henk M. de Bruijn
On Sat, 5 Jan 2008, at 14:44:23 [GMT +0100] (which was 14:44 where I live) Peter Meyns wrote: Hi Peter, when there is more than one sig-delimiter in a message, TB! doesn't recognize the first, but the last one. -- No.1 -- No.2 Confirmed ;-) -- Henk

Re: Sig-delimiter not properly recognized

2008-01-05 Thread Feli Wilcke
Hello Peter, On Sat, 5 Jan 2008 14:44:23 +0100GMT Peter Meyns wrote: PM when there is more than one sig-delimiter in a message, TB! doesn't PM recognize the first, but the last one. I think it was always like that. -- Regards, Feli ^^°-°^^:de-bb: The Bat! 4.0.0.7 (ALPHA) on

Re: Sig-delimiter not properly recognized

2008-01-05 Thread Rick Grunwald
Hello Feli On Saturday, January 5, 2008 you wrote: Hello Peter, On Sat, 5 Jan 2008 14:44:23 +0100GMT Peter Meyns wrote: PM when there is more than one sig-delimiter in a message, TB! doesn't PM recognize the first, but the last one. I think it was always like that. I THINK I remember being

Re: Sig-delimiter not properly recognized

2008-01-05 Thread Rick Grunwald
Hello Thomas On Saturday, January 5, 2008 you wrote: I THINK I remember being told that the pupose of the delimiter was so it would stop at the first one. Feli was right: | [-] Cutting the quoted text at the last signature to avoid confusion | with highlighted signature in RTV I stand

Re: Sig-delimiter not properly recognized

2008-01-05 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Peter, On Sat, 5 Jan 2008 14:44:23 +0100GMT (5-1-2008, 14:44 +0100, where I live), you wrote: PM when there is more than one sig-delimiter in a message, TB! doesn't PM recognize the first, but the last one. That has so for ages on request of those that follow mailinglists as digest. When

Re: Sig-delimiter not properly recognized

2008-01-05 Thread Thomas Lieblang
Hi Rick, on Sat, 5 Jan 2008, at 10:24:09 [GMT -0500] Rick wrote: I THINK I remember being told that the pupose of the delimiter was so it would stop at the first one. Feli was right: in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Stefan wrote: [1] | [-] Cutting the quoted text at the last signature to avoid

Re: Sig-delimiter not properly recognized

2008-01-05 Thread Peter Meyns
Hi Feli, on Sat, 5 Jan 2008 16:17:41 +0100GMT (05.01.2008, 16:17 +0100GMT here), you wrote: FW On Sat, 5 Jan 2008 14:44:23 +0100GMT Peter Meyns wrote: PM when there is more than one sig-delimiter in a message, TB! doesn't PM recognize the first, but the last one. FW I think it was always like

Re: Sig-delimiter not properly recognized

2008-01-05 Thread Peter Meyns
Hi Roelof, on Sat, 5 Jan 2008 16:40:32 +0100GMT (05.01.2008, 16:40 +0100GMT here), you wrote: PM when there is more than one sig-delimiter in a message, TB! doesn't PM recognize the first, but the last one. RO That has so for ages on request of those that follow mailinglists as RO digest. When

Re: Sig-delimiter not properly recognized

2008-01-05 Thread Dwight A Corrin
On Saturday, January 5, 2008, 8:11:09 AM, Henk M. de Bruijn wrote: when there is more than one sig-delimiter in a message, TB! doesn't recognize the first, but the last one. -- No.1 -- No.2 Confirmed ;-) -- Henk _

Re: Sig-delimiter not properly recognized

2008-01-05 Thread Feli Wilcke
Hello Peter, On Sat, 5 Jan 2008 17:22:49 +0100GMT Peter Meyns wrote: PM My confusion came from a change that has PM obviously occurred on the German TB! off-topic list. ... PM A short time ago they must have changed these three dashes to a PM correct sig-delimiter (or was that you?), and I only