Hello Peter,
On 2008-01-05 you wrote:
Hi all,
when there is more than one sig-delimiter in a message, TB! doesn't
recognize the first, but the last one.
Confirmed under 4.0.0.7
--
Regards,
Uwe
Using The Bat! v4.0.0.7 (ALPHA) on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600
Service Pack 2
On Sat, 5 Jan 2008, at 14:44:23 [GMT +0100] (which was 14:44 where I
live) Peter Meyns wrote:
Hi Peter,
when there is more than one sig-delimiter in a message, TB! doesn't
recognize the first, but the last one.
--
No.1
--
No.2
Confirmed ;-)
--
Henk
Hello Peter,
On Sat, 5 Jan 2008 14:44:23 +0100GMT Peter Meyns wrote:
PM when there is more than one sig-delimiter in a message, TB! doesn't
PM recognize the first, but the last one.
I think it was always like that.
--
Regards,
Feli ^^°-°^^:de-bb:
The Bat! 4.0.0.7 (ALPHA) on
Hello Feli
On Saturday, January 5, 2008 you wrote:
Hello Peter,
On Sat, 5 Jan 2008 14:44:23 +0100GMT Peter Meyns wrote:
PM when there is more than one sig-delimiter in a message, TB! doesn't
PM recognize the first, but the last one.
I think it was always like that.
I THINK I remember being
Hello Thomas
On Saturday, January 5, 2008 you wrote:
I THINK I remember being told that the pupose of the delimiter was so
it would stop at the first one.
Feli was right:
| [-] Cutting the quoted text at the last signature to avoid confusion
| with highlighted signature in RTV
I stand
Hallo Peter,
On Sat, 5 Jan 2008 14:44:23 +0100GMT (5-1-2008, 14:44 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:
PM when there is more than one sig-delimiter in a message, TB! doesn't
PM recognize the first, but the last one.
That has so for ages on request of those that follow mailinglists as
digest. When
Hi Rick,
on Sat, 5 Jan 2008, at 10:24:09 [GMT -0500] Rick wrote:
I THINK I remember being told that the pupose of the delimiter was so
it would stop at the first one.
Feli was right:
in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Stefan wrote: [1]
| [-] Cutting the quoted text at the last signature to avoid
Hi Feli,
on Sat, 5 Jan 2008 16:17:41 +0100GMT (05.01.2008, 16:17 +0100GMT here),
you wrote:
FW On Sat, 5 Jan 2008 14:44:23 +0100GMT Peter Meyns wrote:
PM when there is more than one sig-delimiter in a message, TB! doesn't
PM recognize the first, but the last one.
FW I think it was always like
Hi Roelof,
on Sat, 5 Jan 2008 16:40:32 +0100GMT (05.01.2008, 16:40 +0100GMT here),
you wrote:
PM when there is more than one sig-delimiter in a message, TB! doesn't
PM recognize the first, but the last one.
RO That has so for ages on request of those that follow mailinglists as
RO digest. When
On Saturday, January 5, 2008, 8:11:09 AM, Henk M. de Bruijn wrote:
when there is more than one sig-delimiter in a message, TB! doesn't
recognize the first, but the last one.
--
No.1
--
No.2
Confirmed ;-)
--
Henk
_
Hello Peter,
On Sat, 5 Jan 2008 17:22:49 +0100GMT Peter Meyns wrote:
PM My confusion came from a change that has
PM obviously occurred on the German TB! off-topic list.
...
PM A short time ago they must have changed these three dashes to a
PM correct sig-delimiter (or was that you?), and I only
11 matches
Mail list logo