On Fri, 25 Mar 2005 08:33:14 +0100GMT (25-3-2005, 8:33 +0100, where I
live), Martin Schoch wrote:
...snip
Yes - as workaround it's seems to be the solution. But the intention
should be - in my optinion - the find why GnuPG doesn't work
correctly with TheBat.
Or why ThebBat! doesn't work
Hello Martin,
A reminder of what Martin Schoch on TBBETA typed on:
24 March 2005 at 01:23:56 GMT +0100
MS Let's see what result we get when TheBat checks the signature.
Perfect, works fine.
--
Tony.
Using The Bat! v3.0.9.9 Return (pre-beta)
:gentoo:
www.gentoo.org
Hello Martin,
A reminder of what Martin Schoch on TBBETA typed on:
24 March 2005 at 01:28:35 GMT +0100
MS Ok - TheBat can't check the signature - I get the known error
MS message from GnuPG:
Not OK, it checks it fine here, even retrieved your key automatically for
me.
--
Tony.
Using
Hello Henk,
A reminder of what Henk de Bruijn on TBBETA typed on:
24 March 2005 at 07:00:24 GMT +0100
HdB You find my key at biglumber. We are still looking if the errormessage
HdB comes from The Bat! or from GnuPG..
It doesn't come from The Bat, now I have your key it verifies perfectly
Hello Martin,
A reminder of what Martin Schoch on TBBETA typed on:
24 March 2005 at 09:27:54 GMT +0100
MS Which GnuPG version do you have installed?
I'm not, I'm using full blown bona fide PGP 6.5.8 and it verifies your
signature fine.
--
Tony.
Using The Bat! v3.0.9.9 Return (pre-beta)
Hello Martin,
A reminder of what Martin Schoch on TBBETA typed on:
24 March 2005 at 11:02:44 GMT +0100
MS Where to search the problem now?
Why not just try PGP 6.5.8?
--
Tony.
Using The Bat! v3.0.9.9 Return (pre-beta)
:gentoo:
www.gentoo.org
smime.p7s
Description:
Hello Martin,
A reminder of what Martin Schoch on TBBETA typed on:
24 March 2005 at 16:00:34 GMT +0100
MS and in my opinion we should find and fix the problem - not
MS to avoid the problem...
We found the problem, GnuPG don't work properly with The Bat!
To fix the problem, use a version
Dear Martin,
@24-Mar-2005, 20:02 +0100 (24-Mar 19:02 UK time) Martin Schoch [MS] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Martin:
Hmm - I really thought if I should re-install an older version - not
done yet.
MS Ok - tried with GnuPG 1.2.5 - same result. The signed message with
MS Hash RIPEMD160
On Thu, 24 Mar 2005 19:19:24 +GMT (24-3-2005, 20:19 +0100, where I
live), Marck D Pearlstone wrote:
@24-Mar-2005, 20:02 +0100 (24-Mar 19:02 UK time) Martin Schoch [MS] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Martin:
MS Ok - tried with GnuPG 1.2.5 - same result. The signed message with
MS Hash
Hello Martin,
A reminder of what Martin Schoch on TBBETA typed on:
24 March 2005 at 19:08:22 GMT +0100
MS This is not a fix - it's a workaround.
I was only trying to help, besides, a workaround is a bodge to get you by.
Installing a proper version of PGP that fully works is a perfect
On Thu, 24 Mar 2005 22:32:30 +0100GMT (24-3-2005, 22:32 +0100, where I
live), Henk de Bruijn wrote:
On Thu, 24 Mar 2005 19:19:24 +GMT (24-3-2005, 20:19 +0100, where I
live), Marck D Pearlstone wrote:
This has to be entered into the BugTraq system as a general (not beta
specific) bug in
Hey Henk,
just now (on 03/23/2005 at 13:21) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
gpg: Signature made 03/23/05 12:16:08 using DSA key ID DBE6E678
gpg: WARNING: signature digest conflict in message
gpg: Can't check signature: general error
I get the same error when I want to check your signature.
I have
Hallo Henk,
On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 13:21:07 +0100GMT (23-3-2005, 13:21 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:
HDB I have signed this message pgp/mime.
Checks fine.
--
Groetjes, Roelof
Apple (c) Copyright 1767, Sir Isaac Newton
The Bat! 3.0.9.9 Return (pre-beta)
Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack
On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 16:03:16 +0100GMT (23-3-2005, 16:03 +0100, where I
live), Martin Schoch wrote:
...snip
Same error message when I check your mail.
Till now 1.4.1 worked like a charm.
Here GnuPG 1.4.1 installed as well...
You are using Hash ripemd160 - just try with SHA1.
I set Hash
On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 17:50:47 +0100GMT (23-3-2005, 17:50 +0100, where I
live), Martin Schoch wrote:
...snip
I set Hash back to SHA1
And your signature is well checked.
We are not sure now if this is a problem of the new GnuPG version
1.4.1. I'll check a GnuPG forum.
I am a reader/member of
On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 19:55:32 +0100GMT (23-3-2005, 19:55 +0100, where I
live), Martin Schoch wrote:
On Wednesday, March 23, 2005 7:06:48 PM you wrote:
We are not sure now if this is a problem of the new GnuPG version
1.4.1. I'll check a GnuPG forum.
I am a reader/member of gnupg-users, so if
On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 20:08:34 +0100GMT (23-3-2005, 20:08 +0100, where I
live), Martin Schoch wrote:
...snip
Well it could be really a problem with TheBat. I rechecked to send
signed mail with RIPEMD160 with Thunderbird. There is no problem to
check the signature...
It could be problem with
Hello Henk,
A reminder of what Henk de Bruijn on TBBETA typed on:
23 March 2005 at 13:21:38 GMT +0100
HdB I have signed this message pgp/mime.
I don't have your key so it was invalid but I got no errors.
--
Tony.
Using The Bat! v3.0.9.9 Return (pre-beta)
:gentoo:
* Martin Schoch schrieb am 24.03.2005 01:17:
I made also some tests wit RIPEMD160 with Thunderbird (sign and
check) - and the signature are checked without any problems.
As test I send a message with Thunderbird signed with Hash RIPEMD160.
Let's see what result we get when TheBat checks the
Hi Tony,
On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 20:48:54 +GMT (23-3-2005, 21:48 +0100, where I
live), Tony Boom wrote:
TB A reminder of what Henk de Bruijn on TBBETA typed on:
TB 23 March 2005 at 13:21:38 GMT +0100
HdB I have signed this message pgp/mime.
TB I don't have your key so it was invalid but I
On Thu, 24 Mar 2005 01:28:20 +0100GMT (24-3-2005, 1:28 +0100, where I
live), Martin Schoch wrote:
Ok - TheBat can't check the signature - I get the known error
message from GnuPG:
gpg: Signature made 03/24/05 01:23:36 using DSA key ID CCD79551
gpg: WARNING: signature digest conflict in
21 matches
Mail list logo
