Re[2]: About 3.51 release

2005-07-26 Thread Goncalo Farias
In reply to : JW>> o Will it give me an OTFE implementation that I can use (i.e. JW>> that will search my message base without hanging and also JW>> preserve my settings while migrating)? 9> Actually I don't think problems with search reported in list are 9> related to OTFE -

Re[2]: About 3.51 release

2005-07-26 Thread Mike Rourke
TBBETA, On 7/25/2005, 03:14 PM, you scribbled: 9> Hello Jay, JW>> I understand this. But what is not clear to me is why we went from JW>> 3.5.30 to 3.5.36 and then jumped to 3.51 without ever seeming to JW>> complete the 3.5.xx series. 9> Actually 3.51 is the same serie, it just uses new nu

Re[2]: About 3.51 release

2005-07-26 Thread Mike Rourke
TBBETA, On 7/26/2005, 10:28 AM, you scribbled: 9> Hello Boris, BA>> So none bug of BugList can be fixed without serious changes? 9> Surely there are a lot of cosmetic fixes and traslation issues, but 9> I don't think somebody will be satisfied with them more than three 9> days. A pea

Re[2]: About 3.51 release

2005-07-26 Thread MikeD (3)
Hello Stuart, Tuesday, July 26, 2005, 10:48:13 AM, you wrote: >> :) Is it so important to you? SH> It's more an issue of convenience. If I've got the files for 3.51.1 SH> 3.51.9 and 3.51.10 then windoze organises them in the order SH> 3.51.1 SH> 3.51.10 SH> 3.51.9 Hmmm, here are two fixes: 1.

Re[2]: About 3.51 release and IMAP

2005-07-25 Thread Vili
Hello Gary, >>> In some aspects 3.5 is far superior than older versions, >> With regards to IMAP it certainly is. > I still cannot use it for IMAP. Most messages will not load, and I don't > have time to either compress or click to another folder and back again, > every time this happens to re