Re[2]: Beta cycle suggestion

2004-07-28 Thread Gary
Hi Kevin, On Wed, 28 Jul 2004 07:24:29 -0700 UTC (7/28/2004, 9:24 AM -0500 UTC my time), Kevin and Allie wrote in part: I've changed to viewing HTML messages as plain text by default. I'll see how things go with that setting. It shouldn't be long to give feedback on this since the INVALID

Re[2]: Beta cycle suggestion

2004-07-23 Thread Manuel Breitfeld
Hello MaXxX, on 23.07.2004 at 09:36 you wrote: When not fixing bugs and not introducing new filter system, what comes instead? M There's nothing wrong with introducing a new feature or two, if M they're properly debugged. Concurrently, bugs are fixed, not as fast M as possible, but they are.

Re[2]: Beta cycle suggestion

2004-07-23 Thread 9Val
Hello MaXxX, M What a brilliant example! Breathing! :P But allow me to turn it back M at you: you FIRST inhale, THEN exhale, then inhale again, and exhale M again. You wouldn't think of inhaling halfway, then exhaling a little, M then inhaling some more, exhaling some, then finally inhaling

Re[2]: Beta cycle suggestion

2004-07-23 Thread 9Val
Hello MaXxX, M Sure. But - let's say inhaling means new features, and exhaling means M bugfixing. Now, reaching the full lung capacity (a full inhalation) is M a new feature, completely introduced and debugged within itself. Now, M after it's done, one can exhale: fix other bugs, which are now

Re[2]: Beta cycle suggestion

2004-07-23 Thread 9Val
Hello MaXxX, M You want something harder, while not fixing eons-old bugs? Here you M go: mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] M How about that. :P OK, it is flagged :) -- 9Val Current beta is 2.12.03 |

Re[2]: Beta cycle suggestion

2004-07-23 Thread 9Val
Hello MaXxX, M It certainly does have a history of unkept promises... M 2.0 was supposed to have Unicode support. M 2.0 was supposed to be reworked in C++. M 2.0 was supposed to have full and easy IMAP support. M There was supposed to be a rework of the interface. M And..? You are changing

Re[2]: Beta cycle suggestion

2004-07-23 Thread NetVicious
viernes, 23 jul 2004 at 12:45, it seems you wrote: Is bugfixing really so hard? Every programmer programs in his way. When you're reading a source code you don't writed you need to read big parts of code before modifying a single line because you could break something you don't

Re[2]: Beta cycle suggestion

2004-07-23 Thread drifthat
Hello MaXxX, Saturday, July 24, 2004, 5:24:54 AM, you wrote: M It certainly does have a history of unkept promises... M 2.0 was supposed to have Unicode support. M 2.0 was supposed to be reworked in C++. M 2.0 was supposed to have full and easy IMAP support. M There was supposed to be a rework