Re[2]: Current version?

2005-05-10 Thread Martin Webster on tbbeta
Hello Tony, On 10 May 2005, 21:50 you wrote: AM>> It's IMAP. All about IMAP. > Thought as much. I still haven't tried IMAP, still a bit frightened :) Go on, give it a go. Try a Cwazy account; it's not Gmail (only 135MB) but you can check out IMAP for free. See http://www.cwazy.co.uk/. -- A

Re[2]: Current version?

2005-05-10 Thread Martin Webster on tbbeta
Hello Stuart, On 10 May 2005, 14:28 you wrote: MWot>> Could we have an authoritative statement on the current RC please? It MWot>> isn't helpful seeing comments simultaneously relating to RC5, RC6 and MWot>> and upcoming RC7. > Actually, there was a RC6 released that was aimed only at people >

Re[2]: Current version?

2005-05-10 Thread Martin Webster on tbbeta
Hello Allie, On 10 May 2005, 13:41 you wrote: > I must humbly, politely and subserviently apologise for my contribution > to the confusion. My recent report on a crash with the subject having > RC/6 in it, was wrong. I am currently testing RC/5. There's no need to apologise... I saw from your s

Re: Re[2]: Current version?

2005-05-10 Thread Allie Martin
Hi Cees, On 10/05/2005 02:46 PM +0200, you wrote: you are?? AM> X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.0b2 (Win32) AM> X-Rogue: :Allie: hmmm. :rofl2: I'm currently testing TB! RC/5 at home ... at home. :) I'm at work now. I don't use TB! at work. Better now? ;) -- Allie Martin System specs: http://www.ac-

Re[2]: Current version?

2005-05-10 Thread Cees
Het was op dinsdag 10 mei 2005 om 14:41 uur dat jij iets schreef over 'Current version?' : Hallo Allie, AM> I must humbly, politely and subserviently apologise for my contribution AM> to the confusion. My recent report on a crash with the subject having AM> RC/6 in it, was wrong. I am current