Re[2]: IMAP performance

2005-08-21 Thread Fabio Muzzi
Hello Greg, Sunday, August 21, 2005, 12:00:20 AM, you wrote: GS On IMAP at MRB memory was at 33,800K when I first accessed the account GS and NEVER dropped. After minimizing TB, memory dropped to 2,000K. GS After maximizing the main window the view folder window while GS writing this email

Re[2]: IMAP performance

2005-08-20 Thread Tero Ripattila
Hei Clive, Saturday, August 20, 2005, 2:46:55 PM, you [CT] wrote: CT The difference in performance compared to previous releases is CT startling here - just as fast as Mulberry on this system. No lags, no CT delays in fetching messages, accurate message counters. Goodness knows CT where Ritlabs

Re[2]: IMAP performance

2005-08-20 Thread Dwight A Corrin
Hello Clive, Saturday, August 20, 2005, 1:00:22 PM, you wrote: For some reason TB! takes all the processor time - even when doing nothing but waiting mails to arrive. That's very annoying. Can someone confirm this? Not here it doesn't - just a (high) 30Mb of memory usage when it's idling.

Re[2]: IMAP performance no longer what it used to be.

2004-11-11 Thread Chris Weaven
Hi Peter, On Thursday, November 11, 2004 22:19 your local time, which was 21:19 my local time, Peter Fjelsten [PF] wrote; AM -- AM Allie Martin PF Ouch! :) lol - I didn't want to say anything :-) I'm sure it was just an innocent accident, we all do them, either that, or Allie is being