Re[2]: Status Report on the Christmas Edition of The Bat

2004-12-17 Thread Diego Ducatenzeiler
Hello Tony, Friday, December 17, 2004, 5:18:42 AM, you wrote: DD>> Looking at the points above, where does PINE falls? TB> Compared to TB! you mean, about 2. Above Mozilla and T-Bird? (-8 -- Best regards, mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Diego +

Re[2]: Status Report on the Christmas Edition of The Bat

2004-12-16 Thread Diego Ducatenzeiler
Hello Tony, Thursday, December 16, 2004, 7:20:09 PM, you wrote: AL>> Mozilla TB> Tried it... 1/10 AL>> Thunderbird TB> Tried it... 0/10 Looking at the points above, where does PINE falls? -- Best regards, mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Diego +--

Re: Re[2]: Status Report on the Christmas Edition of The Bat

2004-12-16 Thread Kevin J. Menard, Jr.
On Wed, 15 Dec 2004 16:17:04 +0100, Michael Schneider > It's a problem with TB!'s cache. If you move a message to another > folder and don't clear the cache, the next got message will be shown > as the old you just moved. Only solution: clearing cache ... I've experienced this problem for a whil

Re[2]: Status Report on the Christmas Edition of The Bat

2004-12-15 Thread Ethan J. Mings
Wednesday, December 15, 2004, 8:00:26 AM, you wrote: > We've decided to release a stable version with new major > additions at a cost of the nice release date, thus we will most > likely to release the new version in 2005. Thanks for this update. Just to be clear a) There will be *no* Chr

Re[2]: Status Report on the Christmas Edition of The Bat

2004-12-15 Thread Maxim Masiutin
Hello Peter, Wednesday, December 15, 2004, 21:54:52, you wrote: >>BTW, I still can't GPG-sign this message via TB!, because the list >>address is a lower UID, and TB! won't accept my free form primary >>UID... :-( As soon as you've registered this at the bugtracker, you have nothing to worry ab

Re[2]: Status Report on the Christmas Edition of The Bat

2004-12-15 Thread Maxim Masiutin
Hello Tero, Wednesday, December 15, 2004, 15:32:15, you wrote: >>Will this upcoming release be a part of 3.x series? Or perhaps a first >>build of TB! 4.0? :o It will be 3.xx -- Best regards, Maxim Masiutinmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _

Re[2]: Status Report on the Christmas Edition of The Bat

2004-12-15 Thread Ming Chang
Hello Maxim, Wednesday, December 15, 2004, 9:00:26 PM, you wrote: MM> We've decided to release a stable version with new major additions at a cost of the nice release date, thus we will most likely to release the new version in 2005. The DBCS support of v3.02 series is bad. Do you have any pla

Re[2]: Status Report on the Christmas Edition of The Bat

2004-12-15 Thread Michael Schneider
Holla Peter, Wednesday, December 15, 2004 @ 4:03:18 PM: AM>> - wrong message bodies being displayed for messages actually selected. PF> I haven't seen this (I think). It's a problem with TB!'s cache. If you move a message to another folder and don't clear the cache, the next got message will be

Re[2]: Status Report on the Christmas Edition of The Bat

2004-12-15 Thread Maxim Masiutin
Hello Peter, Wednesday, December 15, 2004, 15:45:17, you wrote: >>I hope you will fix the hanging IMAP tasks before that... Sure! -- Best regards, Maxim Masiutinmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Current beta is 3.0.2

Re[2]: Status Report on the Christmas Edition of The Bat

2004-12-15 Thread Michael Schneider
Hi Tony, Wednesday, December 15, 2004 @ 4:32:56 PM: TB> I've been using Linux off and on for years and I've not found any Linux TB> application that's bug free. I don't think I've used any that have less bugs TB> than TB! even. At least most of this software doesn't cost any money and in the

Re[2]: Status Report on the Christmas Edition of The Bat

2004-12-15 Thread Maxim Masiutin
Hello Graham, Wednesday, December 15, 2004, 17:00:03, you wrote: >>NO!!.. re-read Max's post please:-) it should read "at THE cost of..." OK, I'm going back to the English courses. -- Best regards, Maxim Masiutinmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re[2]: Status Report on the Christmas Edition of The Bat

2004-12-15 Thread Michael Schneider
Hi Tony, Wednesday, December 15, 2004 @ 2:24:27 PM: MM>> We've decided to release a stable version with new major additions at a MM>> cost of the nice release date, thus we will most likely to release the new MM>> version in 2005. TB> At the risk of sounding very blunt, is there any considerati

Re[2]: Status Report on the Christmas Edition of The Bat

2004-12-15 Thread Maxim Masiutin
Hello Tony, Wednesday, December 15, 2004, 15:24:27, you wrote: >> At the risk of sounding very blunt, is there any consideration at all of a >> Linux port or are we all hoping for too much? Not yet. The major changes aren't about the Linux port. >> Are we all destined to use Windows for the re

Re[2]: Status Report on the Christmas Edition of The Bat

2004-12-15 Thread Maxim Masiutin
Hello Stuart, Wednesday, December 15, 2004, 15:07:31, you wrote: >>Phew! You will be always be able to use betas anyway, as usual! ;-) -- Best regards, Maxim Masiutinmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Current beta is