Re: SOT: Summer time

2000-07-06 Thread Tony Boom
This message: 06/07/2000 21:04 GMT. Hello Ming-Li, On 06 July 2000 at 09:24:07 GMT -0700 (which was 16:24 where I live) Ming-Li ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) typed: ML Sorry for staying here, for I've no idea what TBOT is. Is it another ML mailing list? I couldn't find it on RITLabs' web site. Sorry

Re: SOT: Summer time

2000-07-05 Thread Thomas Speer
Hello Graham, On 05.07.2000 at 11:58 you wrote: FG What time does this message come up on your machine please Here in Germany which is CET an we have summertime to your message says it was created at 11:58 and I received it at 12:07 which seems to be correct! --

Re: SOT: Summer time

2000-07-05 Thread Tony Boom
This message: 05/07/2000 11:21 GMT. Hello Graham, On 05 July 2000 at 05:58:38 GMT -0400 (which was 10:58 where I live) Graham ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) typed: FG I'm having some problems with British summer time at the moment I noticed this problem when BST started. I am a Radio Amateur and use

Re: SOT: Summer time

2000-07-05 Thread Ming-Li
Hi Tony, The quoting header above is all to cock and we traced this to the fact that, even though my PC is set to GMT, my ISP uses BST and that is what is causing the discrepancy. How your ISP set its clock will affect how it adds the "Received" time to your mail header (see the bunch

Re: SOT: Summer time

2000-07-05 Thread Tony Boom
This message: 05/07/2000 19:25 GMT. Hello Ming-Li, On 05 July 2000 at 06:01:05 GMT -0700 (which was 14:01 where I live) Ming-Li ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) typed: ML Again, the line you pointed to is done by TB! macros. TB! takes the ML Date field from the message you're quoting and compute your local