bug report address

2002-07-29 Thread SyP
Hello The Bat! beta users and developers, It seems [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Help-Feedback-Bug report) has some problems? -8-CUT HERE-- The original message was received at Mon, 29 Jul 2002 19:41:44 +0300 from mail.ritlabs.com [192.168.101.134]

Re: bug report address

2002-07-29 Thread Dierk Haasis
Hello SyP! On Monday, July 29, 2002 at 6:44:06 PM you wrote: It seems [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Help-Feedback-Bug report) has some problems? Could BugTraq be the reason as bugs should be reported there centrally? -- Dierk Haasis http://www.Write4U.de http://Interest.Write4U.de/pongo PGP keys

Re: bug report address

2002-07-29 Thread Alexander Leschinsky
Hello SyP, On Mon, 29 Jul 2002 18:44:06 +0200 (29.07.02 22:44 my local time) you wrote about bug report address, at least in part: S It seems [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Help-Feedback-Bug report) has some S problems? No problems actually for bugs, one of my addresses is non-functional now

Re[2]: bug report address

2002-07-29 Thread Alexander Leschinsky
Hello Dierk, On Mon, 29 Jul 2002 18:49:10 +0200 (29.07.02 22:49 my local time) you wrote about bug report address, at least in part: DH Could BugTraq be the reason as bugs should be reported there DH centrally? For 1. Ordinary users 2. Mail program users No, IMNSHO -- Best regards

Re[2]: The Bat! - bug report - address book

2002-03-21 Thread Lars Geiger
Hi Ron, On Thursday, March 21, 2002 at 10:21:20 [GMT -0500], you wrote: and the names that are proposed are strange; RS Not the same, but as you can see there are two entries for each RS display name, which is unnecessary. The suggestions are a lot more sensible if you enter a middle name,

Re: The Bat! - bug report - address book

2002-03-21 Thread Lars Geiger
Hi Mogens, On Thursday, March 21, 2002 at 11:51:35 [GMT +0100], you wrote: MH The address book no longer suggests a display name in the box MH automatically Confirmed. :-( MH and the names that are proposed are strange; see the attached jpg Not confirmed. -- Regards, Lars The Bat! 1.54

Re[3]: The Bat! - bug report - address book

2002-03-21 Thread Ron Secord
Hi Lars, On Thu, 21 Mar 2002, at 16:28:52 [GMT +0100] (10:28 AM where I live) you wrote the following in regards to The Bat! - bug report - address book: The suggestions are a lot more sensible if you enter a middle name, too. And if you also set a prefix on the next tab

Re[4]: The Bat! - bug report - address book

2002-03-21 Thread Alex Sanyukovitch
Hello Ron, Thursday, March 21, 2002, 10:42:19 AM, you wrote: The suggestions are a lot more sensible if you enter a middle name, too. And if you also set a prefix on the next tab, there are no duplicate suggestions any longer. Is it so difficult for a program to check a list and

Re: The Bat! - bug report - address book

2002-03-21 Thread Markus Gloede
Hi, Ron Secord wrote in msgid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Not the same, but as you can see there are two entries for each display name, which is unnecessary. When you enter a middle name you'll notice that the options are different. To circumvent the display of redundant options the Bat! could check

Re[5]: The Bat! - bug report - address book

2002-03-21 Thread Joseph N.
You're missing the point. They are not duplicate entries. TB!'s address book is set up to display names in several formats, including those common in various countries and contexts. If a user has not filled in all the address book fields, then the entries might appear to be duplicate, but that

Re[6]: The Bat! - bug report - address book

2002-03-21 Thread Alex Sanyukovitch
Hello Joseph, Thursday, March 21, 2002, 11:14:23 AM, you wrote: JN You're missing the point. Let me see... JN They are not duplicate entries. Oh really? JN that is because the program can only display what the user has JN provided. So if when you've received a message from

Re: Ritlabs SecureBat! - bug report - Address autoview on top

2001-12-17 Thread Maxim Masiutin
Hello Marck! The Address auto-view always on top option isn't optional. No matter what the setting, the window is always on top. Currently, the always on top in the address auto-view and memo view is the global option. It affects how are these windows are ordered among windows of

Re: bug report: address book - gender-setting

2000-10-18 Thread Manfred Ell
On Wednesday, October 18, 2000, 9:50:27 PM, you wrote: Hi Richard, On 18 October 2000 at 14:08:50 GMT -0400 (which was 19:08 where I live) Richard M. Newman wrote and made these points on the subject of "bug report: address book - gender-setting": M I just tried this again

Re: bug report: address book - gender-setting

2000-10-18 Thread Marck D. Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Manfred, On 18 October 2000 at 18:38:07 GMT +0200 (which was 17:38 where I live) Manfred Ell wrote and made these points on the subject of "bug report: address book - gender-setting": Open any entry which has its gender set, clos

Re: bug report: address book - gender-setting

2000-10-18 Thread Manfred Ell
On Wednesday, October 18, 2000, 9:40:28 PM, you wrote: Aha - a clue. I don't see a "blank" gender. I see Unspecified, Male or Female. I never see it "blank". It works perfectly here (same OS as you, same TB version). If it doesn't work consistently (and we have several users with the

BUG REPORT: Address book

2000-07-05 Thread Jamie Dainton
Hello tbbeta, When launching the address book it stops responding and will not allow new conatcts to be added. Steps to recreate bug: 1) Launch address book by pressing F8 or the toolbar button. 2) Add a contact or edit and existing contact. 3) Stand back and watch it slow down and crash.

Re: BUG REPORT: Address book

2000-07-05 Thread Allie Martin
On Tue, 4 Jul 2000 22:28:40 +0100, Jamie Dainton wrote: JD Steps to recreate bug: JD 1) Launch address book by pressing F8 or the toolbar button. JD 2) Add a contact or edit and existing contact. JD 3) Stand back and watch it slow down and crash. I can't reproduce the described

The Bat! - minor bug report // address highlight parser

2000-03-30 Thread Markus Gloede
Hello The Bat! developers, I'm using The Bat! Version 1.42 Beta/9 Serial Number 4A849B39 under Windows NT 4.0 Build 1381 Service Pack 5 and would like to report a bug The bug description: Addresses such as [EMAIL PROTECTED] are valid but not recognized by the highlighting