Newly created IMAP. How can I setup Full message sync for all folders
at once? Or do I have to do it one by one?
--
Vili
The Bat 3.86.03 ALPHA (beta) on Windows XP 5.1 2600 Szervizcsomag 2
Current beta is 3.98.10 | 'Using TBBETA'
Hello Vili,
A reminder of what Vili typed on:
Saturday, April 07, 2007 at 21:25:34 GMT +0200
V Newly created IMAP. How can I setup Full message sync for all folders
V at once? Or do I have to do it one by one?
One by one as far as I'm aware.
--
Best regards,
Stuart
Stuart,
On 07-04-2007 21:37, you wrote in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
V Newly created IMAP. How can I setup Full message sync for all
V folders at once? Or do I have to do it one by one?
One by one as far as I'm aware.
Which is cumbersome, I agree completely!
--
greeting Best regards /greeting
Hello Peter,
On 07-04-2007 21:37, you wrote in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
V Newly created IMAP. How can I setup Full message sync for all
V folders at once? Or do I have to do it one by one?
One by one as far as I'm aware.
Which is cumbersome, I agree completely!
Should we fire a wish? I mean,
Hello Vili,
A reminder of what Vili typed on:
Saturday, April 07, 2007 at 22:33:32 GMT +0200
V Should we fire a wish? I mean, it has to be easily implemented.
So many more problems to deal with regarding IMAP first, but I guess
its worth a try.
--
Best regards,
Stuart
Gleason
IMAP seems to be working well for me. Might not hurt to mention which
server you use. Mine is Fastmail.
And mine is SmarterMail Pro 2.6
--
Neal Laugman
Using The Bat! v3.0.9.19 Return and BayesIt! 0.8.0 Release on Win2000 SP4
Hey Neal,
just now (on 04/26/2005 at 09:56) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
IMAP seems to be working well for me. Might not hurt to mention which
server you use. Mine is Fastmail.
And mine is SmarterMail Pro 2.6
For me it's working good. Mine is Fastmail, too.
--
Bye,
Manuel,
On Monday, April 25, 2005 at 8:43:51 PM [GMT -0500], Gleason Pace wrote:
IMAP seems to be working well for me. Might not hurt to mention which
server you use. Mine is Fastmail.
It's there in my sysspecs.
MDaemon Pro 8.0
--
-= Allie Martin =-
The Bat! v3.0.9.18 Return
System Specs:
Hi Manuel,
--On Tuesday, April 26, 2005 10:00 AM +0200 you wrote in part:
IMAP seems to be working well for me. Might not hurt to mention which
server you use. Mine is Fastmail.
And mine is SmarterMail Pro 2.6
For me it's working good. Mine is Fastmail, too.
Actually guys, Fastmail is an email
Gary,
Formeit'sworkinggood.MineisFastmail,too.
Actuallyguys,Fastmailisanemailserviceprovider.TheyuseanIMAP
serveronthebackend,thenameofIdonotknow.Perhapsyoucanemail
theircustomerservicetofindout.ItcouldbeCyrus,UW,Courier,Binc,
orseveralothersinunix/linux,andMDaemon,etc.inawindowsOS.
Hi Gleason,
On Tue, 26 Apr 2005 20:43:38 -0700 UTC (4/26/2005, 10:43 PM -0600 UTC my
time), Gleason Pace wrote:
G Fastmail says they use Cyrus.
cool, thanks, I never knew that.. Cyrus is a great IMAP server, handles
multiple concurrent connections to the same mailboxes, handles ACLs, etc.
Het is maandag 25 april 2005 en 22:33:00 uur :
Hallo tbbeta,
IMAP sync, updating etc. is worse; it used to be quite good with the
previous version.
anyone else noticed worse behaviour compared to v18?
--
groeten,
Cees
WinErr 00F: Unexplained error - Please tell us how
On Monday, April 25, 2005 at 3:34:01 PM [GMT -0500], Cees wrote:
IMAP sync, updating etc. is worse; it used to be quite good with the
previous version. anyone else noticed worse behaviour compared to v18?
All seems fine here so far.
--
-= Allie Martin =-
The Bat! v3.0.9.19 Return
System
Allie,
On Monday, April 25, 2005 at 3:34:01 PM [GMT -0500], Cees wrote:
IMAP sync, updating etc. is worse; it used to be quite good with the
previous version. anyone else noticed worse behaviour compared to v18?
All seems fine here so far.
IMAP seems to be working well for me. Might
Hi 9Val
-
On Mon, 19 Jul 2004, at 21:57:37 [GMT +0300] (which was 11:57 AM where
I live) you wrote:
Hello Kevin,
KA Perhaps 9Val can interject some comments.
Currently TB! establishes only one connection. Multiple connections
are planned, may be
Hello Kevin,
Currently TB! establishes only one connection. Multiple connections
are planned, may be they'll be introduced in next beta cycle.
KA Out of curiosity, are you talking about multiple connections to the
KA server or multi-threading of the application?
About multiple
Allie,
AM I do my filtering server side. I don't know what TB! is like when
AM sync'ing and filtering at the same time.
If TB supported use of 'sieve' to communicate filter rules to the
server, i would do server-side, too.
d/
--
Dave Crocker mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Brandenburg
Hello The Bat! - Betalist,
playing around with TB's IMAP functionality connecting to a local IMAP
Server (MDaemon, Mercury/32) and - let me say - not satisfied with the
sync speed. It's o.k. with folders containing only a few messages (200)
but it's painful with folders conatining a lot of
Hello Frank,
On Fri, 16 Jul 2004 11:21:46 +0200 (16.07.2004 15:21 my local time),
received Friday, July 16, 2004 at 18:56:28 +0600,
you wrote about IMAP - Sync Speed,
at least in part:
FD Just cross tested with Mozillas Thunderbird and Becky.
Repeated tests on my side with
Mdaemon
19 matches
Mail list logo
