-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed 2-Jul-03 6:35pm -0400, Allie Martin wrote:
Allie, I'm curious why your public key can't be found. I use
keyserver ldap://certserver.pgp.com. That shouldn't matter, since
these public keyrings sync with each other.
Are you using a
Gi'day Allie,
It is established that on Wednesday, 2 July 2003, at 18:56:51[GMT
-0500](which was 9:56 AM where I live) you wrote:
That server is among the list of servers in my PGP server list. I moved
it to the top and the key was found. I thought that PGP checked the
servers one after the
Tom Sadler, [TS] wrote:
TS Saw your post over in PGP-Basics list. I've got same problem. No
TS idea at all what is causing it.
It may very well be a problem with the integrated support TB! offers.
Stefan read about the problem and plans to look into it. I've already
posted an entry to bugtraq.
Stefan Tanurkov, [ST] wrote:
ST I suppose so. I did not look at that part of code yet, but I'll try to
ST fix it if I can - it's just some work with PGP SDK... :-)
Hmmm. I hadn't considered that it could be related to TB!'s integrated
PGP support, but now that you mention it ...
ST Please make
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Stephan,
On Wednesday, July 02, 2003 at 00:04 GMT +0200, Stephan Sachse [SS]
wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
SS btw: can the_bat verify this signed message?
Your signature looks okay over here.
gpg: Signature made 07/01/03 18:04:58 Eastern
Hello Kevin,
Monday, June 30, 2003, 1:17:26 AM, you wrote:
KC Thank you. Now for the last one.
Not using PGP/MIME this time. Good signature.
M
--
Best regards,
Martin Webster
The Bat! 1.63 Beta/11 (Windows XP Professional Service Pack 1)
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Peter,
On Saturday, June 28, 2003 at 16:36 GMT +0200, Peter Meyns [PM] wrote
in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
PM on Sat, 28 Jun 2003 10:23:31 -0400GMT (28.06.03, 16:23 +0200GMT
PM here), you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
KC Just experimenting with
7 matches
Mail list logo
