Hello,
On Donnerstag, 6. Juni 2002; 17:08:14, you wrote:
>> My memory issues are still there though.
> You speak that the message editor has leaks? What if you've disabled a
>spellchecker in The Bat!?
i have the same problem. The memory is raised simply when i hit only the
post-button with
Hello Maxim,
On Thursday, June 6, 2002 at 4:16:48 PM you wrote in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (at least in part):
MM> Please tell whether 1.60p is suitable to be put to the download
MM> page. (www.ritlabs.com/the_bat/download.html)
Seems quite stable to me. Running it for a few days and had nor p
On Thursday, June 6, 2002, 17:08, Maxim Masiutin wrote:
>> My memory issues are still there though.
> You speak that the message editor has leaks? What if you've
> disabled a spellchecker in The Bat!?
Can't figure out how to disable the spell checker. I do not use
automatic checking if tha
Hi Marcus,
On Thu, 6 Jun 2002, at 16:24:49 [GMT +0200] (which was 17:24 where I
live) you wrote:
> My memory issues are still there though.
You speak that the message editor has leaks? What if you've disabled a spellchecker
in The Bat!?
--
Maxim Masiutin
http://www.ritlabs.com/
___
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Maxim,
@06 June 2002, 17:16:48 +0300 (15:16 UK time) Maxim Masiutin wrote in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Please tell whether 1.60p is suitable to be put to the download
> page. (www.ritlabs.com/the_bat/download.html)
Other than the reported resource
On Thursday, June 6, 2002, 16:44, Maxim Masiutin wrote:
> I've also noticed that :-) I'll upload the fixed version in 3
> minutes. Please download the file after 3 minutes.
Logging works as it should again.
--
Regards,
Marcus Ohlström
Using The Bat! v1.60q on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195
Confirmed failing on 160q.
Thursday, June 6, 2002, 10:33:34 AM, Marcus wrote:
> On Thursday, June 6, 2002, 16:09, Maxim Masiutin wrote:
> I was to quick. The log panel is empty, in fact, nothing is written to
> the log file at all. Did you by any chance build on the no logging
> version c
Hi Gene,
On Thu, 6 Jun 2002, at 10:44:33 [GMT -0400] (which was 17:44 where I
live) you wrote:
> I have noticed that 160q fails to use the "bong" to announce a
> failure to connect to the server on send or when the server breaks
> the connection on a receive.
Please download the versio
On Thursday, June 6, 2002, 16:09, Maxim Masiutin wrote:
> [-] Fixed problems with mouse wheel scrolling.
Confirmed.
My memory issues are still there though.
--
Regards,
Marcus Ohlström
Using The Bat! v1.60q on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2
PGP Public Key at http://www.canit.se
I have noticed that 160q fails to use the "bong" to announce a
failure to connect to the server on send or when the server breaks
the connection on a receive.
--
Gene mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Windows 2000 [version 5.0.2195]
Mail Client: THE BAT 1.60q
__
Hi Marcus,
On Thu, 6 Jun 2002, at 16:33:34 [GMT +0200] (which was 17:33 where I
live) you wrote:
> I was to quick. The log panel is empty, in fact, nothing is written to
> the log file at all. Did you by any chance build on the no logging
> version compiled for Tony?
I've also noticed that :-
Hi Maxim,
on Thu, 6 Jun 2002 17:09:25 +0300 you wrote in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
> [-] Fixed problems with mouse wheel scrolling.
Thanks a lot for that!!
Is it only me or is the logging still disabled?
--
regards,
Thomas
_
Archi
On Thursday, June 6, 2002, 16:09, Maxim Masiutin wrote:
I was to quick. The log panel is empty, in fact, nothing is written to
the log file at all. Did you by any chance build on the no logging
version compiled for Tony?
--
Regards,
Marcus Ohlström
Using The Bat! v1.60q on Windows 2000 5.0 Bu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Graham,
@06 June 2002, 15:23:33 +0100 Graham Foster wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Please tell whether 1.60p is suitable to be put to the download
>> page. (www.ritlabs.com/the_bat/download.html)
> Eh? - Shouldn't this
On Thursday, June 6, 2002, 16:24, Marcus Ohlström wrote:
> My memory issues are still there though.
BTW, it doesn't matter if I use the PTV or the RTV, same problem with
both. Not surprising since the problem seams to be with the editor and
not with the viewer.
--
Regards,
Marcus Ohlström
Us
Hello Maxim
> Please tell whether 1.60p is suitable to be put to the download
> page. (www.ritlabs.com/the_bat/download.html)
Eh? - Shouldn't this be 1.60Q which you tols us about 7 minutes prior
to this message?
regards,
Graham
Using The Bat! 1.60p
under Windows NT 4.0
(Build
16 matches
Mail list logo
