Re: The Bat! v2.01.49 is now available

Dierk Haasis, [DH] wrote: DH> BTW, do you again have a new key, you are shown as "Unknown DH> Signer"? Yes, I have a new key, signed using my previous key that's now revoked. I had to change keys because the encryption subkey expired and recreating a new one caused some to still read that they ke

Re: Cannot go back to .26

On Saturday, November 22, 2003, 12:17 PM, you wrote: >> I can confirm this finding. :( It seems b49 changes something in the >> account and/or folder properties that is NOT backwards compatible. GS> Thanks for the update Dierk & Dimitry. I think I'll sit with .26 until GS> more information is a

Re: strange>

Hello, cs. You wrote 23.11.2003 @ 1:29 in using mailer The Bat! (v2.01.7) cdnn> I won't cheer too soon, but I just got a new reg.key. from TheBat! team and cdnn> all of a sudden things SEEM to go better. It seems that the registration key again changed (at least pa

Re: Selectiv Download

Hello Eddie, > ...I've being using very long v1.63b7. > > Is there any work around? Have you tried any of the released versions? Do you still have the problem when using them? -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v2.01.3 Winamp OFF: _

Re: Continue processing with other filters

Hello Allen, On 03 November 2003, 00:39 -0500 (22/11/2003 05:39 local time) Allen [A] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: MW>> The filter for Inbox - Known has the check box: Continue processing with MW>> other filters. Setting isn't retained. MW>> Can anyone confirm? A> I can confirm this -- indee

Re: The Bat! v2.01.49 is now available

Hello Laura, On Saturday, November 22, 2003 at 1:05:04 PM you [L] wrote (at least in part): CK>>> I can't open the helpfile by pressing F1. >> in English: "The file ...\The Bat!\THE_BAT.CHM is not a windows help >> file or is damaged." L> could it be you did not yet put your thebat.exe in t

strange>

zaterdag 22 november 2003, 18:28:25 u:: Hallo, I won't cheer too soon, but I just got a new reg.key. from TheBat! team and all of a sudden things SEEM to go better. I'll let you know if things remain this way or that this was just a lucky minute or so. ;-) -- -=/ Rubeo /=- http://ru

Re: Cannot go back to .26

Hello Dimitry, >> Last night I wanted to go back to build 26 as I wrote; it worked for >> the one message I wrote about it. Didn't work today. > I can confirm this finding. :( It seems b49 changes something in the > account and/or folder properties that is NOT backwards compatible. Thanks for t

Re: The Bat! v2.01.49 is now available

Hello Allie! On Saturday, November 22, 2003 at 5:48:32 PM you wrote: > That's what I get on the first attempt after starting TB!. When I try > signing on sending again the AV appears. Interesting, just tried signing with my other answer - and it worked flawlessly. Didn't have so much fun with a

Re: The Bat! v2.01.49 is now available

Hello Allie! On Saturday, November 22, 2003 at 5:48:32 PM you wrote: > That's what I get on the first attempt after starting TB!. When I try > signing on sending again the AV appears. Luckily I didn't have that problem, yet, as I didn't encounter another message to be signed. BTW, do you again

Re: The Bat! v2.01.49 is now available

On 2003-11-22 at 17:40:32 Allie Martin wrote: > Would you try this one? I suspect it's my mailserver doing some munging. Fine here, except for gpg's paranoid warnings of course: gpg: Signature made 11/22/03 17:40:32 using DSA key ID 010721DC gpg: Good signature from "Allie C. Martin, Dr. <[EMAI

Re: The Bat! v2.01.49 is now available

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Allie, On Sat, 22 Nov 2003 11:40:32 -0500 (11:40 AM here), Allie Martin [AM] wrote in : AM> Would you try this one? I suspect it's my mailserver doing some AM> munging. gpg: Signature made 11/22/03 11:40:32 Eastern Standard

Re: Selectiv Download

Hello Eddie, Saturday, November 22, 2003, 2:14:14 PM, you wrote: > Strange was that this file 'was market for deletion' when I looked up > at the Server with 'Ctrl-Alt-F2'. On the Advanced Tap the Filter is > set to 'Ignore'. Has someone else made this same observation? Could it > be a Bug? Yes,

Re[2]: The Bat! v2.01.49 is now available

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Saturday, November 22, 2003/11:51:27 AM RE: "The Bat! v2.01.49 is now available" Greetings Allie, On Saturday, November 22, 2003, 11:40:32 AM, you wrote: MDP>> gpg: BAD signature from "Allie C. Martin Allie> Would you try this one? I suspect it's

Re: The Bat! v2.01.49 is now available

Dierk Haasis, [DH] wrote: DH> Don't worry: I partly confirm. I don't get the AV but cannot sign DH> anymore, the message just sits there and waits for something. That's what I get on the first attempt after starting TB!. When I try signing on sending again the AV appears. -- -= allie_M =- | Li

Re: The Bat! v2.01.49 is now available

Marck D Pearlstone, [MDP] wrote: MDP> gpg: BAD signature from "Allie C. Martin Would you try this one? I suspect it's my mailserver doing some munging. -- -= allie_M =- | List Moderator PGPKeys: http://www.ac-martin.com/pgpkeys.html Using TB! v2.01.49 on W