Re: html editor text sizes displaying wrongly

On Friday, December 5, 2003, 6:40:44 PM, Marek wrote in message: mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] MM> yes, I have reported it already, report is follwing: MM> https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/bug_view_advanced_page.php?bug_id=0002000 Thanks Marek, I'll let the board poster know. -- Cheers, Anne Flying h

Re: html editor text sizes displaying wrongly

Hello all, Friday, December 5, 2003, Anne wrote: >> click on Options - Preferences - HTML/Windows Editor. when i >> select Arial size 10 for Regular Text item, click on OK to save >> settings, and afterward i click on Create a new message button >> on toolbar, all text is in Arial 13 >> >> with R

html editor text sizes displaying wrongly

> click on Options - Preferences - HTML/Windows Editor. when i > select Arial size 10 for Regular Text item, click on OK to save > settings, and afterward i click on Create a new message button > on toolbar, all text is in Arial 13 > > with Regular Text item set to Arial 12, new message window > d

Re: Embarrassed to ask, but..

Hi Marck, On Friday, December 5, 2003 at 13:35 GMT +, authorities charged Marck Pearlstone for writing: > If you want a paragraph to reformat automatically when you edit it, > turn on auto-format! Could the Windows editor[1] be another solution for Chris? ;-) [1] Options -> Message Format

Re[2]: Excruciatingly slow

Hello Daniel, Yup, but thanks for the thought. The machine is fairly lean and has no problems other than the TB slowdowns. -- Best regards, Curt Friday, December 5, 2003, 12:21:00 PM, you wrote: DR> Hello Curt, DR> Friday, December 5, 2003, 12:39:05 PM, you wrote:

Re: Excruciatingly slow

Hello Curt, Friday, December 5, 2003, 12:39:05 PM, you wrote: > POP3 and SMTP servers have been eliminated as a source of the > problems, since a pre-2.x version of TheBat running on another machine > on our network is just as fast and snappy as always. > Has anyone reported this to Bug Track?

Re: Excruciatingly slow

Hello Peter, Interesting. I'm running production 2.01.3 and am experiencing exactly the same slowness as you and others are. And, yes, it happened all of a sudden about 3-4 days ago. I also note: 1. There is a considerable delay after clicking on the Send icon before the Connection Centre appears

Re: Embarrassed to ask, but..

Friday, December 5, 2003, 1:35:56 PM, you wrote: > Hi Chris, > @5-Dec-2003, 12:43 Chris Wilson said to Dierk: >>> Hm, do you use Auto-Format and Auto-Wrap? I only use Auto-Wrap >>> and therefore have to use + to left/align an edited >>> paragraph. >> Thanks for the info, I hope this bug is cor

Re: Embarrassed to ask, but..

Hello Marck! On Friday, December 5, 2003 at 2:35:56 PM you wrote: > Ahem - there is no bug. Oops, that one's on me, I should have phrased it a bit clearer, particularly since the other question asked actually harked back to a known bug (Expand Threads). Sloppy me! -- Dierk Haasis The Bat 2

Re[2]: Excruciatingly slow

Hello Peter, On Fri, 5 Dec 2003 11:38:24 +0100 (05.12.2003 15:38 my local time) you wrote about "Excruciatingly slow", at least in part: PF> (Writing from work now as doing it at home is next to impossible. As you PF> can see I have no problems here, although I am running the same beta a

Re: Embarrassed to ask, but..

Hi Chris, @5-Dec-2003, 12:43 Chris Wilson said to Dierk: >> Hm, do you use Auto-Format and Auto-Wrap? I only use Auto-Wrap >> and therefore have to use + to left/align an edited >> paragraph. > Thanks for the info, I hope this bug is corrected ASAP, it's a > feature I have been after for ages.

Re: Embarrassed to ask, but..

Friday, December 5, 2003, 8:02:05 AM, you wrote: > Hello Chris! > On Thursday, December 4, 2003 at 1:02:40 PM you wrote: >> I cannot figure out how to set this so it sticks. can someone post >> an idiot proof guide? Thanks. > Easy: It's a bug, the option doesn't stick. >> Why won't the spell

Re[2]: Embarrassed to ask, but..

Hello Graham, On Fri, 05 Dec 2003 09:14:37 + (05.12.2003 14:14 my local time) you wrote about "Embarrassed to ask, but..", at least in part: FG> Its been an outstanding request of mine for about 4 years AFAIK { It's require changing spell-check engine - both used now can't work with

Re: Signature delimiter (was: Re: Backup script was: (The Bat! v2.01.49 is now available))

Hi, Tony Boom wrote in msgid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: > Believe me I have tried... BLOODY HARD! And what makes it worse is I can see > the delimiter is there, space an all just by running the cursor over it. But I > bet the trailing space is gone when this gets to the list. You won your bet. (SCNR) Th

Re: Excruciatingly slow

Peter, On 03-12-2003 23:07, you [P] wrote in : PK>> Try without Spampal. P> No SpamPal here. Only K9. It *must* be the name... *lol* I have tried with Spampal and without. I have tried with MyGate and without. I am 100% sure no virus scanners are running. I downgraded t

Re: Signature delimiter (was: Re: Backup script was: (The Bat! v2.01.49 is now available))

On Mon, 1 Dec 2003 19:20:10 +0100, Marcus Ohlström wrote : > Ah, you are emailing from PocoMail. Don't know about PocoMail so I'll > trust you. Exactly. I've been using TB! for quite a few years and have been on this and all the other TB lists for the same period. Do you honestly believe I don't