Marcus,
On Wednesday, January 21, 2004, 10:29:47 AM, you (Marcus Ohlström) wrote:
MO> On Wednesday, January 21, 2004, 00:04, Ian A. White wrote:
>> Once you have entered ANY text in the message body, the attachment
>> list will NOT update no matter what you do. This is not how it
>> worked with
On Wednesday, January 21, 2004, 00:04, Ian A. White wrote:
> Once you have entered ANY text in the message body, the attachment
> list will NOT update no matter what you do. This is not how it
> worked with Beta/33.
Are you sure? IIRC, templates has never been applied after you have
edited the m
Hello Marcus,
> v.2.03 beta/40 is, IMHO, more stable then the last "stable release".
> But that's just my opinion. Then again, I see you are still using the
> good old v2.01.3.
It is not only your opinion. The last "stable release" is supposed to be
2.02.3 CE and that is precisely why I'm still u
Ethan,
On Wednesday, January 21, 2004, 12:52:10 AM, you (Ethan J. Mings) wrote:
EJM> Crafted from The Desk on location in the Quality Lab.
EJM> Hello Ian,
EJM> Monday, January 19, 2004, 8:20:48 PM, you wrote:
>> With Beta/33, when I had %ATTACHMENTS in my message template, as soon
>> as I attac
On Tuesday, January 20, 2004, at 10:37:14 PM, Marek Mikus wrote the
following words:
>> They were even addressed by Stefan himself on this list. "The edit
>> control doesn't allow for telling where the cursor is, so the issue is
>> unfixable" was his response. Why so many applications have it righ
Hello all,
Tuesday, January 20, 2004, MaXxX wrote:
>>> ctrl+shift+arrows does not move the cursor by words and only moves
>>> the leftmost/rightmost selection end, and clicking a too-long header
>>> field results in it being selected and the cursor moved to the end.
>>> Not to mention the complete
On Tuesday, January 20, 2004, 22:04, MAU wrote:
>> You know you can turn it off? You can even, since a few betas, turn
>> auto completion for subjects off and still leave auto completion
>> for addresses on. Great improvement.
> It certainly is. It is too bad I can't use betas because of work.
>
On Tuesday, January 20, 2004, at 9:44:19 PM, the old mahogany desk
trembled gently as Marcus Ohlström began rapidly hitting his squeaky
typewriter's keys:
> You know you can turn it off? You can even, since a few betas, turn
> auto completion for subjects off and still leave auto completion for
>
Hello Marcus,
> You know you can turn it off? You can even, since a few betas, turn
> auto completion for subjects off and still leave auto completion for
> addresses on. Great improvement.
It certainly is. It is too bad I can't use betas because of work. I'll
have to wait till next release (if i
On Tuesday, January 20, 2004, 18:42, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
> If I hit ctrl-K on a message and then hit print, I would like it to
> be printed with the headers. I think this was the case in earlier
> versions of TB. Time for a wish-list entry?
Yes, indeed. Why not create a new macro, something
On Tuesday, January 20, 2004, 18:46, MaXxX wrote:
> I get a headache each time I have to edit some header fields:
> autocompletion pops up replacing my carefully-wrought subjects and
> recipients
You know you can turn it off? You can even, since a few betas, turn
auto completion for subjects off
Ethan,
On Wednesday, January 21, 2004, 12:52:10 AM, you (Ethan J. Mings) wrote:
EJM> Crafted from The Desk on location in the Quality Lab.
EJM> Hello Ian,
EJM> Monday, January 19, 2004, 8:20:48 PM, you wrote:
>> With Beta/33, when I had %ATTACHMENTS in my message template, as soon
>> as I attac
On Tuesday, January 20, 2004, at 6:21:25 PM, the old mahogany desk
trembled gently as MAU began rapidly hitting his squeaky typewriter's
keys:
>> editor's header "pain" :>
> Does that mean that the editor has a headache? ;-)
In theory, yes. But seeing as computers' problems propagate onto their
13 matches
Mail list logo
