Re: Who cares is rogues are real faces/people?

Hello Michael, On Mon, 12 Jul 2004 19:05:30 -0700 (10:05 PM here), you [MLW] wrote: MLW> I am confused why it matters if rogue pictures show a real face, MLW> or a real body with no face, or, in one exception, a drawing. Personally, I prefer to see a human face because I'm interested in seeing a

Re: Sorry, but what is the rogue?

Hello MaXxX, On Tue, 13 Jul 2004, at 00:56:18 [GMT +0200] (which was 6:56:18 PM in NY, USA) MaXxX wrote: >> Fetch alone can't trigger anything, to my knowledge. > Oh yes, it can. It's an HTTP request, so it can easily be: > 1. traced - after all, the owner's IP is verified > 1.1. traced for spe

Re: Rouge info mail 'Your Roguemoticons was disapproved'

Hello Frank, Monday, July 12, 2004, 9:13:35 AM, you wrote: Frank> Regarding the latest 'improvements' of TB better say: shouldn't Frank> have anything to do with port 80 Has nothing to do with TB specifically. Any mail program that HREFS images uses port 80. That's pretty much every e-mail client

Re: Who cares is rogues are real faces/people?

Monday, July 12, 2004, 10:05:30 PM, Michael wrote: MLW> I am confused why it matters if rogue pictures show a real face, or a MLW> real body with no face, or, in one exception, a drawing. Does my MLW> email have any less meaning in this list because I use a cartoon or a MLW> drawing of einstein?

IMAP: Thread view

Imagine a thread of three messages, all of them unread. If I click on a message, it doesn't get marked as read (by switching the font attribute from bold to roman) after two seconds. This will only happen when all messages belonging to the thread are read. This makes it hard to see which messages

Who cares is rogues are real faces/people?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Greetings All, I am confused why it matters if rogue pictures show a real face, or a real body with no face, or, in one exception, a drawing. Does my email have any less meaning in this list because I use a cartoon or a drawing of einstein? Since th

Re: IMAP: Delete key still doesn't always work in RC/4

Hi Charles, On Tue, 13 Jul 2004 03:45:39 +0200 UTC (7/12/2004, 8:45 PM -0500 UTC my time), Charles M. Gerungan wrote: C> Subject says it all. ditto --- 10-4 confirmed -- Gary Current beta is v2.12 RC/4 | 'Using TBBETA' info

Re: IMAP: Delete key still doesn't always work in RC/4

Hi Charles M. Gerungan - On Tue, 13 Jul 2004, at 03:45:39 [GMT +0200] (which was 6:45 PM where I live) you wrote: > Subject says it all. Yes, that appears to be the case. -- Best Regards, Kevin Using The Bat! v2.12 RC/4 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 S

Re: RC/3: Focus problem

Hello 9Val, MF>> (WinXP Prof. SP1 - TB! v2.12/rc3) > Appeared in RC3? mmhh, perhaps it was the rc/1 -- best regards Miroslav Current beta is v2.12 RC/1 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html I

Re: Account switching and passwords

Greetings BatPeople, Monday, July 12, 2004, 7:08:24 PM, Mike wrote: M> I've found that right clicking on The Bat! icon in the tray M> and trying to switch active accounts also brings up a password dialog M> on non-password protected accounts. Not a terrible bug, but a bug M> none

Re: RC/3: Focus problem

Hello Thomas Fernandez, > What's happening and can somebody confirm? I had this phenomenon two three times and thought it was because of my computer. Apparent I am nevertheless not the only one - thus I confirm your description. (WinXP Prof. SP1 - TB! v2.12/rc3) -- best regards Miroslav BAT-

IMAP: Delete key still doesn't always work in RC/4

Subject says it all. -- Regards, Charles. pgpjM3Akanzam.pgp Description: PGP signature Current beta is v2.12 RC/4 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, us

Re[2]: Concerns about Smileys and Roguemoticons

Bonjour Thomas, Il est indéniable que Thomas Fernandez a proféré le lundi 12 juillet 2004 à 22:06:54 GMT +0700 TF> I don't believe you. ;-) Well, I call translation the act of interpreting English into my native French. This happens slightly quicker than, say, understanding a Bavarian waite

Re: Sorry, but what is the rogue?

Hello Richard, Sunday, July 11, 2004, 2:10:14 PM, you wrote: Richard> Now it does, yes. But my comment took reference to Richard> : Richard> ---[Quote]--- Richard> Should rogues be changed for an X-Rogue: url_of_my_jpg instead of Richard> actual :tag: ? Richard> ---[/Quote]-

Re: Concerns about Smileys and Roguemoticons

Monday, July 12, 2004, 2:32:21 PM, Dennis wrote: DH> Quoting Plan9 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> But it's not a fair rule since many of use have not been featured >> on the front of a magazine. It creates an elite group that excludes >> the rest of us (discrimination). DH> Well, let's think about this.

Account switching and passwords

I've found that right clicking on The Bat! icon in the tray and trying to switch active accounts also brings up a password dialog on non-password protected accounts. Not a terrible bug, but a bug nonetheless. -- Mike Using The Bat! v2.12 RC/4 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service P

Re: Rouge info mail 'Your Roguemoticons was disapproved'

On Monday, July 12, 2004, 7:30 PM, you wrote: MDP> Allie must have gone to the website and downloaded the latest zips, MDP> unpacked them into the TB folder then pressed C-A-S-T. You don't say MDP> that you did that. You should also delete the old PDSF2.msl file in MDP> case it is confusing the i

Re[2]: IMAP: Browsing messages still being disrupted (Was: Re: The Bat! 2.12 RC/3 is now available)

Hello Allie, On Monday, July 12, 2004, at 05:50:07[GMT [EMAIL PROTECTED] (which was 3:50 where I live) Allie wrote: Allie> As a matter of fact, yes Allie> I just went to Folder -> Browse deleted messages. In that message list Allie> there are the last 6 or so messages that I had replied to. I

Re: Sorry, but what is the rogue?

Hello Allie, Monday, July 12, 2004, 5:43:17 AM, you wrote: Allie> A worm or something that edits the file, and uses TB! to fetch Allie> its payload or whatever else it needs to complete its task. It's possible. Anything is possible. What if a worm infects TB and uses TB on port 25 or 110 or 143 t

Re: Sorry, but what is the rogue?

Hello Marck, On Mon, 12 Jul 2004 09:55:41 +0100 GMT (12/07/2004, 15:55 +0700 GMT), Marck D Pearlstone wrote: MDP> Lesse ... setting aside the issue of mail server access, TB connects MDP> to a fixed, named server under your control to fetch smileys, rogues MDP> and PGP keys administrated by a res

Re: Rouge info mail 'Your Roguemoticons was disapproved'

Hello Manuel, hello The Bat! - Betalist, * Manuel Breitfeld wrote: > A mail-programm has nothing to do with port 80. Regarding the latest 'improvements' of TB better say: shouldn't have anything to do with port 80 -- cheers Frank Curr

Re: to moderators

Hello Marek, On Mon, 12 Jul 2004 11:06:46 +0200 GMT (12/07/2004, 16:06 +0700 GMT), Marek Mikus wrote: >> since 1999 and I remember a neat .exe-file of about 3 MB, compared to >> the mammoth 8 MB of the actual version - I just wonder how much >> junk-code remains in some hidden corners of it!) MM

Re: Rouge info mail 'Your Roguemoticons was disapproved'

Hello Thomas, hello The Bat! - Betalist, * Thomas Fernandez wrote: > Good point! How to I tell TB to "download new pics now"? Create a plain textfile in TB's home-dir and name it 'auto-load-urls.txt' containing the following line: http://www.pcwize.com/thebat/getrogue.php But you won't see/aut

Re: Rouge info mail 'Your Roguemoticons was disapproved'

Dear Kevin, @12-Jul-2004, 08:03 -0700 (12-Jul 16:03 UK time) Kevin Amazon said to Marck: >> You won't see /that/ picture. It's not approved and has since been >> withdrawn. One way of getting new pictures is to do a weekly refresh >> of the Rogues.zip and overwrite your current set. > Ok, now I'

Re[2]: Rouge info mail 'Your Roguemoticons was disapproved'

Hello Thomas Fernandez, on 12.07.2004 at 16:45 you wrote: FD>> Now I've updated my photo but you can't see my face :-) TF> Good point! How to I tell TB to "download new pics now"? Yoh shouldn't have the possibility to tell this TB! A mail-programm has nothing to do with port 80. -- Best regards,