On Sunday, September 12, 2004, 12:01, Marcus Ohlström wrote:
Here is headers that do produce a match in 3.0.0.8:
I am terrible sorry, the headers I claimed to produce a match do NOT
produce a match either, I am sorry for any confusion.
Further testing shows that none of the examples I just
On Sunday, September 12, 2004, 12:15, Marcus Ohlström wrote:
Replying again, to test filters.
--
Regards,
Marcus Ohlström
Using The Bat! v3.0.0.8 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 4
PGP Public Key at http://www.canit.se/~marcus/pgp.asc
On Sunday, September 12, 2004, 12:18, Marcus Ohlström wrote:
On Sunday, September 12, 2004, 12:15, Marcus Ohlström wrote:
Replying again, to test filters.
Here the filter (Header field References contains canit.se) broke.
Four lines in the references field:
References: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sunday, September 12, 2004, 12:24, Marcus Ohlström wrote:
Replying again, to test filters.
A few more tests to see if the filter starts working again.
--
Regards,
Marcus Ohlström
Using The Bat! v3.0.0.8 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 4
PGP Public Key at
On Sunday, September 12, 2004, 12:26, Marcus Ohlström wrote:
Replying again, to test filters.
A few more tests to see if the filter starts working again.
A few more tests to see if the filter starts working again.
--
Regards,
Marcus Ohlström
Using The Bat! v3.0.0.8 on Windows 2000 5.0
On Sunday, September 12, 2004, 12:27, Marcus Ohlström wrote:
Replying again, to test filters.
A few more tests to see if the filter starts working again.
A few more tests to see if the filter starts working again.
A few more tests to see if the filter starts working again.
--
Regards,
On Sunday, September 12, 2004, 12:27, Marcus Ohlström wrote:
Replying again, to test filters.
A few more tests to see if the filter starts working again.
A few more tests to see if the filter starts working again.
A few more tests to see if the filter starts working again.
OK, I'll quit
Hello Marcus,
Still four lines. Number of lines is not enough to explain why filter
sometimes work and sometimes not. I haven't found any pattern yet,
Maybe, but it has something to do I think. Look at attached PNG. My
'Involved filter should have marked all your messages as blue.
Can't
Hello Avi!
On Saturday, September 11, 2004, 11:46 PM, you wrote:
MB [Livio] said that he had a need for the Reduce button--not the
MB Minimize button--and it was missing. So I wanted to see whether
MB or not I experienced his lack--I did--and I found a work-around
MB and posted it.
AY Mary, to
On Sunday, September 12, 2004, at 10:28:10 AM, Mark Partous jumped on
the stage, took a mike and sang:
eyeBALLS ?? Isn't that a little bit drastic?
Seems to me that scanning the IRIS can be done whithout any kind of
extraction! :-)
Indeed, however scanning a hole in the pupil won't provide
Hello MaXxX!
On Sunday, September 12, 2004, 7:42 AM, you wrote:
M You are surely referring to the retina, which is located about 1.5 cm
M behind the iris, are you not? :P
But it's such a nice pun on iris, MXxX! And scanning the iris--with
my own eyeballs--I do receive *some* information: I can
On Sunday, September 12, 2004, at 3:04:11 PM, Mary Bull conjured the
following magic formulae:
LOL
Send us a pun on retina?
Are you sure eye should make a caba-retina serious mailing list? Or am
iris-king lash-ing with a pal-lid trout? Should I really
hel-pupil-lory me?
:P
--
|\ /|
Hello MaXxX!
On Sunday, September 12, 2004, 8:27 AM, you wrote:
MB Send us a pun on retina?
M Are you sure eye should make a caba-retina serious mailing list? Or am
M iris-king lash-ing with a pal-lid trout? Should I really
M hel-pupil-lory me?
M :P
rolling on floor laughing, or in
Hello MaXxX,
Sunday, September 12, 2004, 2:42:30 PM, you wrote:
eyeBALLS ?? Isn't that a little bit drastic?
Seems to me that scanning the IRIS can be done whithout any kind of
extraction! :-)
M Indeed, however scanning a hole in the pupil won't provide any
M biometric data.
A hole in a
On Sunday, September 12, 2004, at 4:05:52 PM, Mark Partous sculpted a
piece of raw silicon into the thoughts below:
A hole in a hole, how can that be? :-) The pupil _is_ the hole.
My bad. I mixed the pupil with the iris.
The basic notion remains, however - it is the retina that is most
Hi MAU
-
On Sun, 12 Sep 2004, at 12:15:26 [GMT +0200] (which was 3:15 AM where
I live) you wrote:
Hello MAU,
Can anyone confirm a similar behaviour?
I cannot even confirm it myself. It works sometimes and it doesn't some
other times.
I'm finding
16 matches
Mail list logo
