Re[2]: Reply to All (TO and CC fields)

In reply to mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : RO Hallo Carsten, RO On Fri, 6 Jun 2008 10:51:28 +0200GMT (6-6-2008, 10:51 +0200, where I RO live), you wrote: CGS In a business environment it is crucial that people who are in CGS TO: stay in TO: and those in CC: stay in CC:, because that's a CGS huge

Re: Reply to All (TO and CC fields)

am Samstag, 7. Juni 2008 um 10:03 schrieb Goncalo Farias: CGS In a business environment it is crucial that people who are in CGS TO: stay in TO: and those in CC: stay in CC:, because that's a CGS huge difference! CGS Can this be fixed? Or is there a way to get around this bug CGS using

Re: New QTs as Common QTs still dont work

Hello all, Saturday, June 7, 2008, Jens Franik wrote: Guten Tag   The Bat! Beta, new created QTs under Common QTs still dont work at all. Also they show not up in the select Dialog. (Nobody hears at me?) Confirmations? yes, confirmed, Stef knows about it -- Bye Marek Mikus Czech

New QTs as Common QTs still dont work

Guten Tag   The Bat! Beta, new created QTs under Common QTs still dont work at all. Also they show not up in the select Dialog. (Nobody hears at me?) Confirmations? -- Mit freundlichen Grüßen Jens Franik mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Picture of me? X-Rogue http://www.de2all.de/Kr_bat.jpg The Bat!

Re: Reply to All (TO and CC fields)

Hallo Goncalo, On Sat, 7 Jun 2008 09:03:22 +0100GMT (7-6-2008, 10:03 +0200, where I live), you wrote: CGS Can this be fixed? Or is there a way to get around this bug CGS using templates? RO Use a quick template (or a default reply template) with something like GF Isn't that a work around?

Re: Reply to All (TO and CC fields)

Hallo Goncalo, On Sat, 7 Jun 2008 09:03:22 +0100GMT (7-6-2008, 10:03 +0200, where I live), you wrote: RO To be honest, I like TB's current behaviour in this. GF It really doesn't do much sense, IMHO. I agree with Carsten it make GF all the difference (IMHO, not only in Business

Re: Reply to All (TO and CC fields)

On Saturday, June 7, 2008, 4:10:57 PM, Roelof Otten wrote: Well, that's something I agree with. It's important to whom you address a message and to whom you give notice. I'd think in the adult world what would be important would be that all the right people got the mail. -- Dwight A. Corrin

Re[2]: Reply to All (TO and CC fields)

Hello Dwight, Sunday, June 8, 2008, 10:26:01 AM, you wrote: DC On Saturday, June 7, 2008, 4:10:57 PM, Roelof Otten wrote: Well, that's something I agree with. It's important to whom you address a message and to whom you give notice. DC I'd think in the adult world what would be important